Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The syntax, information structure, and prosody of German ‘VP’-fronting

Bibliographic Data

ID20344251
AuthorsVera Lee‐schoenfeld (0000-0002-1133-5338, University of Georgia, corresponding author), Vera Lee-Schoenfeld, Anya Lunden (William & Mary)
Year2019
Volume36
Issue2
Pages231-283
Publication date2019-05-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Linguistic Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-6318 • E-ISSN: 1613-3676
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/tlr-2018-2012
OpenAlexW2904872846
LanguageEN
References cited25

This paper explores fronted verb phrases in German, drawing attention to the difference between passive/unaccusative VPs and fronted agentive v Ps. While both kinds of verb phrases have been discussed in the literature as being frontable, it has been largely overlooked that fronted v Ps typically come with a certain kind of post-fronting context and a rise-fall or bridge-contour intonation, which is characteristic of I-topicalization. We observe that, unlike VPs, agentive v Ps essentially need to be I-topics, with a high tone at the right edge of the fronted domain, in order to be frontable. Given the special context required for fronted v Ps, the situation described by the v P does not contain new information but must already have been under discussion and is now being commented on. We present the results of two experimental studies and appeal to the thetic/categorical distinction to offer a new angle on the definiteness effect that has been associated with fronted verb phrases. We propose that a subject-containing fronted v P is associated with a thetic rather than the default categorical judgment, which means that the fronted subject and predicate form only one information-structural unit (a topic) rather than two (topic and comment). Contributing to the literature on theticity, we observe that, unlike in non-fronting thetic statements, the subject in fronted v Ps cannot be a true definite. We attribute this to clashing intonation restrictions on theticity in non-fronting constructions versus theticity in just the fronted portion of a sentence

Complementizer · German · Linguistics · Syntax · Topicalization · Word order · Computer Science · History · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity

    Open Access•Daniel Grodner, Edward Gibson et al.•Cognitive Science•2005

  • Types of topics in German and Italian

    Mara Frascarelli, Roland Hinterhölzl•On Information Structure, Meaning…•2007

  • Linguistic complexity

    Open Access•Edward Gibson•Cognition•1998

  • Derivation by Phase

    Noam Chomsky•Ken Hale•2001

  • Severing the External Argument from its Verb

    Angelika Kratzer•Phrase Structure and the Lexicon•1996

  • A Comprehensive grammar of the English language

    Geoffrey N Leech, Jan Svartvik et al.•A Comprehensive grammar of the…•1985

  • Contrast and movement to the German prefield

    Werner Frey•Architecture of Focus•2006

  • Zur Frage der grammatischen Repräsentation thetischer und kategorischer Sätze

    Hans Bernhard Drubig•Informationsstruktur und Grammatik•1992

  • Topicalization and Other Puzzles of German Syntax

    Hubert Haider•Scrambling and barriers•1990

  • Specificity and Definiteness in Sentence and Discourse Structure

    Klaus Von Heusinger•Journal of Semantics•2002

  • Intonation and Contrast

    Dieter Wunderlich•Journal of Semantics•1991

  • VP-fronting

    Dana Ott, Dennis Ott•The Linguistic Review•2018

  • Grammatical weight and relative clause extraposition in English

    Open Access•Elaine J Francis•Cognitive Linguistics•2010

  • Intonational structure in Japanese and English

    Open Access•Mary E Beckman, Janet B Pierrehumbert•Phonology Yearbook•1986

  • A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency

    Open Access•Michael A Covington, John A Hawkins•Performance Theory of Order and…•1995

  • Three reasons for accenting a definite subject

    Open Access•D J Allerton, Alan Cruttenden•Journal of Linguistics•1979

  • Scope Inversion under the Rise-Fall Contour in German

    Manfred Krifka•Linguistic Inquiry•1998

  • Discourse new, F-marking, and normal stress

    Open Access•Michael Rochemont•Lingua•2013

  • The thetic/categorical distinction revisited once more

    Open Access•Inger Rosengren•Linguistics•1997

  • The thetic/categorical distinction revisited

    Open Access•Hans-Jürgen Sasse•Linguistics•1987

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae