Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Coordination versus separation

Difference of gapping between Chinese and English and its prosodic attribution

Bibliographic Data

ID20344288
AuthorsBaopeng Ma (0000-0001-8788-9292, Linyi University), Di Zhang (0000-0002-9199-5634, Linyi University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume40
Issue3
Pages361-403
Publication date2023-09-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Linguistic Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-6318 • E-ISSN: 1613-3676
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/tlr-2023-2005
OpenAlexW4386308019
LanguageEN
References cited39

In this paper, we have analyzed a whole set of data of gapping in Mandarin Chinese from a novel point of view and fleshed out a bi-sentential derivation analysis for the formation of this construction. While taking the canonical gapping in English as a reference, we have explored some idiomatic properties of the relevant structures in Chinese and summarized core differences: the gapping constructions in English follow a strict rule of sentence grammar while those of Chinese have demonstrated kind of inter-sentential effect. We propose that such differences can be attributed to the prosodic factors: The Constraint on Sentential Intonation in Chinese (CSIC for short), firstly proposed in Feng (Feng, Shengli. 2017. Hanyu jufa zhongyin yudiao xianghu zuoyong de yufa xiaoying. ‘On grammatical effects of interactions between intonation, stress and syntax’. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Study] (1). 1–15), bans the occurrence of the coordinate [VP & VP] structures, and thus two parallel but separate sentences are used in the contexts where a sentence with VP coordination in English is used. Then, the verb in the second sentence is deleted at PF under the identity condition. Consequently, the gapping structures thus formed demonstrate their own unique properties and are different from the canonical gapping in English. The result of our discussion indicates that prosody can play a role in accounting for language specificities as well as cross-linguistic variations

Grammar · Linguistics · Mandarin Chinese · Natural language processing · Prosody · Sentence · Syntax · Verb · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

  • Intonation and Meaning

    Daneel Buring, Daniel Büring•Intonation and Meaning•2016

  • Prosodic Phonology

    Marina Nespor, Irene Vogel•Prosodic Phonology•2007

  • The Syntax of Silence

    Jason Merchant•The syntax of silence•2001

  • The Syntax‐Phonology Interface

    Open Access•Elisabeth Selkirk•The Handbook of Phonological Theory•2011

  • The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery

    Laura Rizzi, Luigi Rizzi•Elements of Grammar•1997

  • Intonation and Prosodic Structure

    Open Access•Caroline Fery•Intonation and Prosodic Structure•2016

  • The (Non-)Existence of Gapping in Chinese and Its Implications for the Theory of Gapping

    Open Access•Sze-Wing Tang, Sze‐Wing Tang•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2001

  • Prosodically constrained postverbal PPs in Mandarin Chinese

    Open Access•Shengli Feng•Linguistics•2003

  • The focus and prosodic structure of German Right Node Raising and Gapping

    Caroline Fery, Katharina Hartmann•The Linguistic Review•2005

  • Phonological Effects on Syntactic Variation

    Arto Anttila•Annual Review of Linguistics•2016

  • Intonational phrasing

    Open Access•D Robert Ladd•Phonology Yearbook•1986

  • Gapping as hypothetical reasoning

    Open Access•Yusuke Kubota, Robert Levine et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2016

  • A two-source hypothesis for Gapping

    Open Access•Deborah Potter, Michael Frazier et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2017

  • The Interrogative Left Periphery

    Veneeta Dayal•Linguistic Inquiry•2025

  • Prosody and sentencehood in Chinese

    Open Access•Baopeng Ma, H Zhuang•Lingua•2021

  • Topic-Comment Structure, Focus Movement, and Gapping Formation

    Ruixi Ressy Ai•Linguistic Inquiry•2014

  • On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases

    Hubert Truckenbrodt•Linguistic Inquiry•1999

  • Prosodic Phrasing and theThat-Trace Effect

    Yosuke Sato, Yoshihito Dobashi•Linguistic Inquiry•2016

  • Embedding the Antecedent in Gapping

    Maziar Toosarvandani•Linguistic Inquiry•2016

  • Gapping Is Not (VP-) Ellipsis

    Kyle Johnson•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • On Prosodic Vacuity and Verbal Resumption in Asante Twi

    Jason Kandybowicz•Linguistic Inquiry•2015

  • Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases

    P Li, Yen-Hui Audrey Li•Linguistic Inquiry•1998

  • Contrast and Island Sensitivity in Clausal Ellipsis

    Open Access•James E Griffiths, James Griffiths et al.•Syntax•2014

  • Clauses in Noncanonical Positions at the Syntax-Phonology Interface

    Open Access•Duk‐ho An•Syntax•2007

  • Verb gapping in Chinese

    Open Access•Willow Paul, Waltraud Paul•Lingua•1999

  • Pseudogapping, Parallelism, and the Scope of Focus

    Open Access•Gary Thoms•Syntax•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae