Word meaning and concept expressed

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20344345
AutoresRobyn Carston (0000-0003-0820-8968, autor de correspondencia)
Año2012
Volumen29
Número4
Fecha de publicación2012-01-26
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Linguistic Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0167-6318 • E-ISSN: 1613-3676
EditorialWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/tlr-2012-0022
OpenAlexW1993814132
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas34
Referencias citadas6

The concept expressed by the use of a word in a context often diverges from its lexically encoded context-independent meaning: it may be more specific or more general (or a combination of both) than the lexical meaning. Grasping the intended concept involves a pragmatic process of relevance-driven adjustment or modulation of the lexical meaning in interaction with the rest of the utterance and with contextual information. The issue addressed here is the nature of the input to the pragmatic process of meaning adjustment, that is, the nature of the standing (encoded) meaning of the word type. The widespread assumption that lexical meaning is conceptual, hence directly expressible, is challenged and a case made for the merits of an account of word type meaning in non-conceptual terms

Cognition · Lexical definition · Linguistics · Relevance theory · Utterance · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation