Rise of the Auxiliaries
A case for auxiliary raising vs. affix lowering
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20344496 |
|---|---|
| Autores | William Harwood (Ghent University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2014 |
| Volumen | 31 |
| Número | 2 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2014-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Linguistic Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0167-6318 • E-ISSN: 1613-3676 |
| Editorial | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/tlr-2014-0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2321484211 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 45 |
The syntax of auxiliaries has given rise to much discussion in the generative literature (Akmajian and Wasow 1975; Emonds 1978; Akmajian et al. 1979; Pollock 1989; Chomsky 1993; Lasnik 1995b; Roberts 1998; Bjorkman 2011; Rouveret 2012). This paper explores the distribution of non-finite auxiliaries in Standard English, in particular the issue as to whether such auxiliaries raise for inflectional purposes or remain in their base positions and have their inflections lowered onto them. It is shown that auxiliary distribution is not determined by auxiliary type (passive, copular, progressive etc.) as the lowering accounts predict, but by the morphological form that the auxiliary takes. In particular, the auxiliaries
Affix · Generative grammar · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Pollock · Syntax · Computer Science · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Being progressive is just a phase
What ellipsis can do for phases and what it can’t, but not how
Against Upwards Agree
An asymmetry in word-internal Chinese-English code-switching
The relation between head movement and periphrasis
Deriving the functional hierarchy
Ergative as Perfective Oblique
To be or not to be elided
A Scope Argument against T-to-C Movement in Sluicing
Syntactic theory
The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis
Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts
The Raising of Predicates
The Syntax of Agreement and Concord
The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features
Toward a Modular Theory of Auxiliary Selection
What VP Ellipsis Can Do, and What it Can't, But Not Why
Derivation by Phase
Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure
Severing the External Argument from its Verb
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
Lectures on Government and Binding
There is only one way to agree
Transitivity failures in the left periphery and foot-driven movement operations
VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology
Gerunds without Phrase Structure
Small clauses in Spanish and English
Deletion versus pro-forms
Be careful where you float your quantifiers
Existential Sentences
Two approaches to the analysis of tags
Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase
Deriving the functional hierarchy
The position of subjects
An Asymmetry in Voice Mismatches in VP-Ellipsis and Pseudogapping
Building and Merging, not Checking
Head Movement in Linguistic Theory
Movement Operations after Syntax
The Semantic Uniformity of Traces
Parameterizing Passive Participle Movement
Negative Concord and (Multiple) Agree
Voice and Ellipsis
Negation, Polarity, and Deontic Modals
The Interaction of Th/Ex and Locative Inversion
Have/Be Raising, Move F, and Procrastinate
The Origin and Content of Expletives
Relativized minimality
Issues in adverbial syntax
A multifactorial approach to adverb placement
Quantifiers as functional heads
A grammar of contemporary English
On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree
Language-particular syntactic rules and constraints
Subjects in Japanese and English
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,75 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |