Automatic evaluation of open-ended questions for online learning. A systematic mapping
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20349371 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emiliano Del Gobbo (0000-0003-1088-7306, University of Foggia, corresponding author), Alfonso Guarino (0000-0002-9055-9689, University of Foggia), Barbara Cafarelli (0000-0002-7385-4213, University of Foggia), Luca Grilli (0000-0003-4550-9276, University of Foggia), Pierpaolo Limone (0000-0003-3852-4005, University of Foggia) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 77 |
| Pages | 101258 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies In Educational Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0191-491X • E-ISSN: 1879-2529 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101258 |
| OpenAlex | W4361026235 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 58 |
The assessment of students’ performances in Higher Education is one of the essential components of teaching activities. Open-ended tasks allow a more in-depth assessment of students’ learning levels, but their evaluation and grading are time-consuming and prone to subjective bias. Since the Covid-19 pandemic, most traditional Higher Education courses converted to online courses; automatic grading and feedback tools and methods (AGFTM) have become critical components of online learning systems, especially with regards to short answers and essays assessment. This work frames the recent advancement in AGFTM through a systematic mapping of the research field and a literature review. This analysis gives an overview of the trends, specific goals, methods, quality of proposals, challenges and limitations in this research area. The results indicate that it is a growing research area, with a large set of techniques involved, but still not mature, where practical implementations have yet to come
Closed-ended question · Mathematics education · Statistics · Computer Science · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Mathematics · Online and Blended Learning · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology
A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education
Faculty assessment of generative AI’s impact on education and its associated risks
Açık Uçlu Sorulardan Oluşan Lise Düzeyi Ülke ve İl Geneli Sınavların Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi
Innovative solutions to fashion’s biggest problems – the impact of artificial intelligence on solutions for Sustainable Development Goals 9 and 12. A case study from London College of Fashion
Exploring an effective automated grading model with reliability detection for large‐scale online peer assessment
Assessing Learners in Higher Education
Man-Computer Symbiosis
Sentence-Bert
The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education
Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research
Learning analytics
Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and Moocs
Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so
An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field
Bibliometrix
Automatic short answer grading by encoding student responses via a graph convolutional network
Statewide implementation of automated writing evaluation
Mapping the scattered field of research on higher education. A correlated topic model of 17,000 articles, 1991–2018
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators
The role of self and peer assessment in Higher Education
Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods
Emerging Topics in Brexit Debate on Twitter Around the Deadlines
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |