On One More Concept of “Neolithic” Based on the Postmodernism Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID20354079
AuthorsDmytro Haskevych (0000-0002-2831-1092, corresponding author)
Year2022
Issue4
Pages105-119
Publication date2022-12-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArheologia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0235-3490 • E-ISSN: 2616-499X
PublisherNational Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15407/arheologia2022.04.105
OpenAlexW4313395788
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited20

Valerii Manko and Guram Chkhatarashvili published their article in the “Arheologia”, No. 2, 2022. In the paper, they discussed the migration of bearers of four Neolithic flint industries from Southwest Asia through the Caucasus to the south of Eastern Europe from the final Pleistocene to the early Atlantic. According to the authors, stable connections between these remote areas led to the emergence of four “information networks”, which they called “Cultural-Historical Regions” (CHR). The authors believe that the first region of such type in human history was the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in the Near East. Therefore, they call the “theoretical basis” of their study “the idea of understanding the Neolithic as an epoch of the formation of global information networks, within which innovations created in the Near and Middle East were disseminated.” V. Manko began to develop the described theoretical views in 2010 when he wrote that the reason for the emergence of the CHR is the ability to communicate, formed due to the mental changes of inhabitants of the PPNA large settlements. The statement about specific psyche and worldview as the basis of Neolithic has been expressed as an idea of Post-Processual archaeology long before V. Manko announced it. In particular, Trevor Watkins developed this concept in detail. However, V. Manko does not mention publications by any post-processualists in his articles. The statement about the formation of the ability to communicate only in the Neolithic is V. Manko’s novelty. He based it on one reference to a publication of Alexey N. Sorokin, who allegedly claimed that the bearers of different flint industries did not contact each other in the central part of European Russia in the Mesolithic. V. Manko misinterpreted this particular subjective observation and gave it the meaning of a global pattern. Thus, his definition of the Neolithic is controversial, because of using this erroneous premise. Generally, V. Manko’s theoretical reasoning is full of contradictions, logical errors, terminological chaos, and rhetoric in the postmodernism style. It is noteworthy that V. Manko himself does not fully adhere to his previous theoretical views in his later works

Ancient history · Archaeology · Epistemology · Geography · Human settlement · Middle East · Novelty · Pleistocene · Pottery · Psyche · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · History · Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities · Marine and environmental studies · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access