Presenting the “Nestorian” Monument From the Late Seventeenth to the Early Eighteenth Century
The Role of Michał Piotr Boym (1612–1659) and Claude Visdelou (1656–1737)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20355186 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John W Witek (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 301-313 |
| Publication date | 2011-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Monumenta Serica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0254-9948 • E-ISSN: 2057-1690 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1179/mon.2011.59.1.015 |
| OpenAlex | W578160457 |
| Language | EN |
Research on this topic led to some interesting, but at times inaccurate statements about Father Michal Piotr Boym, a Jesuit missionary in China whose writings became a link in the cultural relations of China and Europe during the seventeenth century and later. In the 1876 edition of Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, Carl Gustav Adolph Siegfried wrote a biographical sketch of Boym in one sentence, mentioned Boym' s Flora Sinensis of 1656 and his writings about medicine that Andre Cleyer (1634? -1698) edited. He then concluded: Because of the newer literature about China, everything else has become fairly meaningless.1 The term fairly meaningless raises questions concerning nineteenth-century historiography about China. This conference with its focus on Boym seeks to broaden and rectify that discussion. A major thrust of the literature about the Nestorian Monument centers on its discovery or on its being featured in the work of Athanasius Kircher (1601
Ancient history · Art · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Philosophical and Historical Studies · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Highly cited | No |
|---|