Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Navigating the Ethical Landscape of AI in Healthcare

Insights From a Content Analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID20362116
AuthorsYin Wu (0000-0002-6364-4597, Marymount University), Xiang Michelle Liu (0000-0002-1801-3171, Marymount University)
Year2023
Volume42
Issue3
Pages76-87
Publication date2023-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIEEE Technology and Society Magazine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0278-0097 • E-ISSN: 1937-416X
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1109/mts.2023.3306543
OpenAlexW4386952190
LanguageEN
References cited26

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has gained tremendous popularity over recent years, given its enormous potential for strengthening the quality and efficiency of healthcare services on a global scale. However, the deployment of AI in healthcare comes with both benefits and risks for patients, healthcare professionals, and the whole society. Ethical concerns, such as how to prevent AI from perpetuating preexisting health disparities while incorporating its full potential in a traditional medical setting, have been pointed out by many researchers and policymakers [1] , [2] . As regulatory frameworks and guidelines concerning ethical issues have been published by many organizations, there is a pressing need to present an overview of existing documents to see what has been achieved and what has yet to be emphasized in the field of AI health-related applications

Health care · Political science · Popularity · Public relations · Software deployment · Software engineering · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law

  • Using Software in Qualitative Research

    Christina Silver, Ann Lewins•Using Software In Qualitative…•2014

  • Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA

    Open Access•Udo Kuckartz, Stefan Rädiker•Analyzing Qualitative Data with…•2019

  • Managing the Message

    Anastasiya Zavyalova, Michael D Pfarrer et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2012

  • Principled Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Jessica Fjeld, Nele Achten et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2020

  • The Ethics of AI Ethics

    Open Access•Thilo Hagendorff•Minds and Machines•2020

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

    Open Access•Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca et al.•Nature Machine Intelligence•2019

  • Content analysis and thematic analysis

    Open Access•Mojtaba Vaismoradi, Hannele Turunen et al.•Nursing & Health Sciences•2013

  • The Discovery of Grounded Theory

    Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss•Discovery of Grounded Theory•2017

  • The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory

    Antony Bryant, Kathy Charmaz•The SAGE Handbook of Grounded…•2007

  • The ethics of AI in health care

    Open Access•Jessica Morley, Caio C Vieira Machado et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Ji Young Cho, Ji Cho et al.•Qualitative Report•2014

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae