Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The trajectory of the “Možno ja X?” construction

Variation in speech acts of request in contemporary Russian

Bibliographic Data

ID20366208
AuthorsElmira Zhamaletdinova (0000-0002-6334-0948, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume46
Issue2
Pages133-164
Publication date2022-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRussian Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0304-3487 • E-ISSN: 1572-8714
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11185-022-09265-6
OpenAlexW4297220311
LanguageEN
References cited18

I explore the ongoing language change in which the impersonal modal word možno ‘can, be possible’ takes a personal clause ( možno + nom ) as its complement instead of the Experiencer in the Dative case ( možno + dat) and the infinitival clause in the speech act of request in Contemporary Russian. The corpus-based evidence reveals that the construction možno + dat is gradually being replaced by možno + nom . I discuss various syntactic and pragmatic factors such as verb class, aspect, transitivity and politeness strategies that motivate the choice of a specific modal construction. Methods of statistical modelling, used to sort out the most significant factors contributing to the choice of construction, show that the most important factor is the date of creation of the text. I propose a scenario for the development of the možno + nom construction. First, možno began to be used as a tag-question after both infinitive and personal clauses. The requester marked by the Dative has been steadily replaced by the more agentive Subject in the Nominative case. Then, by analogy with the možno + dat construction, možno was placed at the beginning of the sentence and was reanalyzed as a constructional unit with the following structure: možno + finite clause , in which možno functions as a sentence adverb

Adverb · Causative · Dative case · Dependent clause · Infinitive · Linguistics · Nominative case · Sentence · Syntax · Transitive relation · Verb · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Linguistic research and analysis · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Interlanguage Pragmatics

    Anna Trosborg•Interlanguage Pragmatics•1995

  • Lexicalization and Language Change

    Open Access•Laurel J Brinton, Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Lexicalization and Language Change•2005

  • Constructions

    Open Access•Adele E Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2003

  • Who needs particles? A challenge to the classification of particles as a part of speech in Russian

    Open Access•Anna Endresen, Laura A Janda et al.•Russian Linguistics•2016

  • Wiener Slawistischer Almanach

    Victor Terras•The Slavic and East European…•2002

  • Modality's semantic map

    Open Access•Johan Van Der Van Der Auwera, Vladimir Plungian et al.•Linguistic Typology•1998

  • Emergent communicative norms in a contact language

    Open Access•Irina Y Dubinina, Sophia A Malamud•Linguistics•2017

  • S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change

    Open Access•Richard A Blythe, William Croft•Language•2012

  • Clitics and Particles

    Arnold M Zwicky•Language•1985

  • The Acquisition of Subjecthood

    Peter Cole, Wayne Harbert et al.•Language•1980

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae