Acquiring the transitive construction in English
The role of animacy and pronouns
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20367749 |
|---|---|
| Authors | KELLY DODSON (Emory University), M Tomasello (0000-0002-1649-088X, Max Planck Society) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 605-622 |
| Publication date | 1998-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Child Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0305-0009 • E-ISSN: 1469-7602 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0305000998003535 |
| PMID | 10095327 |
| OpenAlex | W2137749314 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
Twenty-four children between 2;5 and 3;1 were taught two nonce verbs. Each verb was used multiple times by an adult experimenter to refer to a highly transitive action involving a mostly animate agent (including the child herself) and a patient of varying animacy. One of the verbs was modelled in the Two-Participants condition in which the experimenter said: ‘Look. Big Bird is dopping the boat’. The other verb was modelled in the No-Participant condition in which the experimenter named the Two-Participants but did not use them as arguments of the novel verb: ‘Look what Big Bird is doing to the boat. It's called keefing’. It was found that whereas many children produced transitive sentences with the Two-Participants verb, only children close to 3;0 produced transitive sentences with the No-Participant verb. This age is somewhat younger than previous studies in which young children were asked to produce transitive sentences with two lexical nouns for the two animate participants. Also, re-analyses of previously published studies in which children learned novel verbs in sentence frames without arguments found that the few transitive sentences produced by children under 2;6 involved either I or me as subject. One hypothesis is thus that as young children in the third year of life begin to construct a more abstract and verb-general transitive construction, this construction initially contains only certain types of participants expressed in only certain kinds of linguistic forms
Animacy · Causative · Cognitive psychology · Combinatorics · Linguistics · Noun · Sentence · Transitive relation · Verb · Computer Science · Language Development and Disorders · Mathematics · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Verbs and Syntactic Frames in Children’s Elicited Actions
The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development
Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations
Do young children have adult syntactic competence?
Automatic Analysis of Constructional Diversity as a Predictor of EFL Students’ Writing Proficiency
The acquisition of linking theories
The effects of extensive reading on young Korean students’ construction development
Developmental aspects of English argument structure constructions for Korean-speaking second language learners
Cognitive indigenization effects in the English dative alternation
Assessment of sentence sophistication in L2 spoken production
Item-based foreign language learning of give ditransitive constructions
Argument ordering in simple sentences is affected by age of first language acquisition
Syntactic generalization with novel intransitive verbs
Early morphological productivity in Hungarian
Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition
German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology
Against stored abstractions
How animacy impacts word order in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)
Actuality bias in verb learning
The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction
Assessing Verb-Construction Integration in Young Learners of English as a Foreign Language
The role of number of referents and animacy in children's use of pronouns
Argument realization in Hindi caregiver-child discourse
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.88 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2026 (27) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |