Paradigmatic consequences of the suffixing preference

As one of the most robust typological findings, the suffixing preference captures the empirical observation that grammatical categories are more likely to be coded by suffixes than by prefixes. The goal of this contribution is to explore the effects that this asymmetry may have on the inflectional paradigms of the languages of the world. Three empirical issues are addressed: do languages with either possessive prefixes or suffixes and languages with both possessive prefixes and suffixes differ in their suffix-to-prefix ratio? Do prefixes and suffixes differ in the number of cases that they code? Do prefixes and suffixes differ in their probability of explicit singular in addition to plural marking? The answer to all three questions is in the affirmative. These effects are understood in terms of a response to an inherent disadvantage of prefixes. Morphological systems reduce the processing difficulty incurred by prefixes by assigning them fewer tasks (i.e. number of cases), by limiting their occurrence in highly competitive contexts (i.e. inconsistent possessive-affix coding) and by creating prefix paradigms, which are conceived of as protective structures in which the individual members strengthen one another. The general claim these three effects lead up to is that morphological systems develop “repair strategies” which reduce the processing cost involved in using inherently disadvantaged units. These repair strategies shape morphological structure

Linguistics · Plural · Possessive · Prefix · Subcategorization · Suffix · Verb · Computer Science · Language and cultural evolution · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

• The interaction of affix size, type and shape

  Open Access•Tim Zingler, Phillip Rogers•Linguistic Typology•2025

  Incluir item

• A functional approach to the formal mismatches of indexation markers

  Open Access•Tim Zingler•Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft•2023

  Incluir item

• VeLePa

  Open Access•Borja Herce•Morphology•2024

  Incluir item

• The Paradigmatic Structure Of Person Marking

  Michael Cysouw•PARADIGMATIC STRUCTURE OF PERSON…•2003

  Incluir item

• The functions of structural priming

  Victor S Ferreira, Kathryn Bock•Language and Cognitive Processes•2006

  Incluir item

• Broken agreement

  Open Access•Kathryn Bock, Carol A Miller•Cognitive Psychology•1991

  Incluir item

• Icelandic

  Stefán Einarsson•Icelandic•2000

  Incluir item

• Ordering biases in cross-linguistic perspective

  Open Access•Thomas Berg•Linguistic Typology•2020

  Incluir item

• The Distribution of Subject and Object Agreement and Word Order Type

  Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker•Studies in Language•1996

  Incluir item

• Accounting for the position of verbal agreement morphology with psycholinguistic and diachronic explanatory factors

  Andrés Enrique-Arias, Andrés Enrique‐Arias•Studies in Language•2002

  Incluir item

• The Multiplanar Nature of Frequency

  Thomas Berg•Glottotheory•2016

  Incluir item

• Linguistic Analyses

  Christine A Montgomery, Archibald N Tucker et al.•Language•1969

  Incluir item

• Notes on Windesi Grammar

  Open Access•H K J Cowan•Oceania•1955

  Incluir item

• Explaining asymmetries in number marking

  Open Access•Martin Haspelmath, Andres Karjus•Linguistics•2017

  Incluir item

• Nominal Tense in Crosslinguistic Perspective

  Open Access•Rachel Nordlinger, Louisa Sadler•Language•2004

  Incluir item