Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Justiciability of Religion

Bibliographic Data

ID20385307
AuthorsSatvinder Juss (King's College London, corresponding author), Satvinder S Juss
Year2017
Volume32
Issue2
Pages285-310
Publication date2017-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0748-0814 • E-ISSN: 2163-3088
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/jlr.2017.29
OpenAlexW2533283952
LanguageEN
References cited11

In Shergill & Others v. Khaira & Others [2014] UKSC 33, the UK courts considered whether a Sikh holy saint had the power to dismiss trustees who questioned his “succession” to the religious institution of the Nirmal Kutia Johal . The Supreme Court, reversing the decision of the Court of Appeal that religious questions were “nonjusticiable,” reinstated the judgment at first instance of the High Court to the contrary. The decision of the Supreme Court is important because whenever questions of the identification and legitimacy of successors to a religious institution have arisen, their “justiciability” before a secular court has invariably been a bone of contention on grounds that it threatens the autonomy of religious institutions. In Shergill the Supreme Court got around these concerns by drawing a normative distinction between the public law of the land (which the courts are required to determine), and the internal private law of a religious institution on matters of succession, ordination, and removal (which are not in themselves for the courts to decide). But Shergill also went further than previous case law in two respects. First, the fundamental tenets of a belief system are capable of an objective assessment by a secular court provided that there is public law element to a dispute, in which case the court can then decide on the fitness of the successor for office. This means there is no general presumption that a secular court is barred from considering religious questions per se. Second, these principles apply just as much to the judicial consideration of non-Christian faiths as they to the Christian religion, and this is so notwithstanding the court's unfamiliarity with other faiths

Appeal · Concurring opinion · Court of equity · Court of record · Human rights · Institution · Justiciability · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Precedent · Presumption · Sociology · Supreme court · Law · Legal and cultural studies analysis · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment · Religious Freedom and Discrimination

  • The Knowledge of God in Calvin’S Theology

    Edward A Dowey•The Knowledge of God in Calvin’S…•1952

  • A Secular Europe

    Lorenzo Zucca•A Secular Europe•2012

  • Secular Judges and Christian Law

    Baroness Hale•Ecclesiastical Law Journal•2015

  • Christian Doctrine and Judicial Review

    Open Access•Frank Cranmer•Ecclesiastical Law Journal•2002

  • The Knowledge of God in Calvin's Theology

    Brian G Armstrong•Sixteenth Century Journal•1997

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae