Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Susan Pfeiffer , Richard Lazenby , James Chiang
ANO 1995
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Journal of Physical Anthropology
ISSN 0002-9483
E-ISSN 1096-8644
EDITORA Berghahn Journals (United Kingdom)
DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330960110
CITAÇÕES 6
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 745b7635c69b18e1dc4651f3497e4353

Resumo

It has been argued that techniques for estimating adult ageat‐death from cortical histology are deleteriously affected by sampling location. This study uses nine complete femoral midshaft cross‐sections to test the effect of sampling site on measurement of a standard histological variable, percent remodeled bone. Circumferential periosteal fields from four anatomically defined locations (anterior, posterior, medial, lateral) and four mechanically defined locations (maximum and minimum moments of area) were evaluated. Locations deviating from the periosteal surface toward the endosteal surface were also compared. Significant differences were found for both location and field placement. The anatomical axes exhibited greater variability than the mechanical axes, in particular the anterior location, a standard sampling site for age‐at‐death estimation techniques. More endosteal fields tended to show elevated levels of percent remodeled bone. This study demonstrates that circumferential and radial sampling locations are important considerations in deriving and applying predictive equations based on cortical remodeling. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Ferramentas