Hobbes on the Signification of Evaluative Language

Bibliographic Data

ID20394366
AuthorsStewart Duncan (Department of Philosophy, University of Florida, [email protected], corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume32
Issue2
Pages159-178
Publication date2019-10-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHobbes Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0921-5891 • E-ISSN: 1875-0257
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/18750257-03202001
OpenAlexW2981147392
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Hobbes, in both the Elements of Law and Leviathan , argues that a wide variety of terms – including ‘good’, ‘bad’, and the names of virtues and vices – have a double and inconstant signification. This paper explores and explains that theory of Hobbes’s. (Two other interpretations are discussed: Pettit’s discussion in terms of indexicals, and Alexandra’s in terms of sense and reference.) This inconstancy of signification has considerable potential to cause confusion and conflict. Given those practical consequences, it is of some importance for Hobbes to find a solution to this problem. The paper examines several possible Hobbesian solutions to the problem. There is reason to think that these suggested solutions cannot completely solve the problem. Hobbes appears to believe that an appropriately powerful sovereign can resolve such problems when necessary, but this is a practical solution that relies on sovereign power, and the difficulty is never in principle resolved

Confusion · Epistemology · Intellectual history · Law and economics · Physics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access