Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Interpersonal grammar of Korean

A Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID20396103
AuthorsGi-Hyun Shin (UNSW Sydney, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume25
Issue1
Pages20-53
Publication date2018-08-10
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueFunctions of Language (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0929-998X • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/fol.17017.shi
OpenAlexW2885482292
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited15

This paper provides an account of interpersonal resources in Korean from the perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics. The focus is upon the paradigmatic interdependency of addressee deference, mood, stance and politeness , and the syntagmatic interaction of their realisations with polarity, modality, vocation and the participant deference in this language. Specifically, this paper puts two arguments forward. One is that the system of formality is fundamental in Korean. The system has two choices: formal and informal. mood and addressee deference belong to formal resources, and involve power-oriented language use. stance and politeness are informal resources, and involve solidarity-oriented language use. The other argument is that realisations of interpersonal resources are scattered across ranks in Korean. The paper advocates SFL’s top-down paradigmatic perspective, which enables us to pull resources together in an account that formalises their interdependency while respecting their divergent realisations

Closeness · Deference · Epistemology · Formality · Indirect speech · Interdependence · Interpersonal communication · Linguistics · Politeness · Sociology · Systemic functional linguistics · Communication · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Structure markers

    Open Access•J R Martins, J R Martin et al.•Language, Context and Text. The…•2023

  • Tense in Khorchin Mongolian

    Open Access•Dongbing Zhang•Language Sciences•2021

  • Studies in Evidentiality

    Victoria International Workshop on Evidentiality Bundoora, Alexandra Y…•Studies in evidentiality•2003

  • The Language of Evaluation

    Open Access•J R Martins, J Martin et al.•Language of Evaluation•2005

  • English Text

    J R Martins, J R Martin•English Text•1992

  • Evidentiality

    Johanna Nichols, Wallace L Chafe•Evidentiality•1986

  • An Introduction to Functional Grammar

    M A K Halliday, Μ Α Κ Halliday et al.•Introduction to Functional Grammar•2014

  • Papers in Korean Linguistics

    CORNELIUS C KUBLER, Chin-W Kim•Language•1981

  • Revisiting “polite” –yo and “deferential” –supnita speech style shifting in Korean from the viewpoint of indexicality

    Open Access•Lucien Brown•Journal of Pragmatics•2015

  • Mirativity

    Open Access•Scott Delancey•Linguistic Typology•1997

  • Evidentiality

    Alexandra Y Aikhenvald, A I͡U Aĭkhenvalʹd•Evidentiality•2004

  • Cognitive realization markers in Korean

    Open Access•Susan Strau•Language Sciences•2005

Citations per year0.4
Citation span2021 - 2023 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae