Seeing is believing
Societal differences in AI awareness and the link to AI-related beliefs
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20398024 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sarah V Bentley (0000-0002-7771-1631, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, autor correspondente), David Evans (0000-0001-7258-3485), David H Evans (0000-0002-9157-4610, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 2863-2876 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | AI & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00146-025-02554-w |
| OpenAlex | W4413988363 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 64 |
Today, there is a call for a responsible integration of AI into society. Building transparency and explainability into this integration is key, meaning AI should be understandable to end-users. Given the prevalence of AI in everyday technology, this focus on seeing into the black box misses a more fundamental need, that being an initial awareness of its presence. Using survey data collected from Australian ( $$n=303$$ n = 303 ) and UK ( $$n=301$$ n = 301 ) populations, this study estimates differences in awareness of AI across societal groups, as well as the relationship between AI awareness and beliefs about AI. Results demonstrate significantly lower awareness for traditionally digitally excluded groups, which is exacerbated for intersectional groupings such as those categorised by gender, age, and education. Further, lack of awareness predicts negative beliefs about AI. These findings highlight the importance of calibrating levels of AI visibility according to the needs of different people across society
Art · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Performing arts · Visual arts · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
The Network Society
Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains.
Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health
How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science
Daily Well-Being
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Public attitudes towards algorithmic personalization and use of personal data online
The political and social contradictions of the human and online environment in the context of artificial intelligence applications
Transparency in artificial intelligence
Impacts of Attitudes Toward Government and Corporations on Public Trust in Artificial Intelligence
The importance of the assurance that “humans are still in the decision loop” for public trust in artificial intelligence
Does digital inclusion affect quality of life? Evidence from Australian household panel data
Artificial Intelligence and Declined Guilt
The digital divide
Unlocking society's standings in artificial intelligence
Between security and convenience
Drivers behind the public perception of artificial intelligence
Awareness and perception of artificial intelligence operationalized integration in news media industry and society
Digital Sociology
Why Aren't Our Digital Solutions Working for Everyone
An unfinished journey? Reflections on a decade of responsible research and innovation
Trust, awareness, and independence
Internet skills and the digital divide
Artificial intelligence and mass personalization of communication content—An ethical and literacy perspective
The outcomes of gaining digital skills for young people’s lives and wellbeing
An introduction to the information age
Cognition in context
Measuring trustworthiness is crucial for medical AI tools
Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings
Price and the person
Household and Individual Digitisation and Deprivation
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |