Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mitigating implicit and explicit bias in structured data without sacrificing accuracy in pattern classification

Bibliographic Data

ID20399116
AuthorsFabian Hoitsma (Tilburg University), Gonzalo Nápoles (0000-0003-1936-3701, Tilburg University, corresponding author), Çiçek Güven (0000-0002-1939-8325, Tilburg University), Yamisleydi Salgueiro (0000-0002-1946-0053, University of Talca)
Year2025
Volume40
Issue4
Pages2551-2570
Publication date2025-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAI & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00146-024-02003-0
OpenAlexW4400514027
LanguageEN
References cited31

Using biased data to train Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms will lead to biased decisions, discriminating against certain groups or individuals. Bias can be explicit (one or several protected features directly influence the decisions) or implicit (one or several protected features indirectly influence the decisions). Unsurprisingly, biased patterns are difficult to detect and mitigate. This paper investigates the extent to which explicit and implicit against one or more protected features in structured classification data sets can be mitigated simultaneously while retaining the data’s discriminatory power. The main contribution of this paper concerns an optimization-based bias mitigation method that reweights the training instances. The algorithm operates with numerical and nominal data and can mitigate implicit and explicit bias against several protected features simultaneously. The trade-off between bias mitigation and accuracy loss can be controlled using parameters in the objective function. The numerical simulations using real-world data sets show a reduction of up to 77% of implicit bias and a complete removal of explicit bias against protected features at no cost of accuracy of a wrapper classifier trained on the data. Overall, the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art bias mitigation methods for the selected data sets

Cognitive psychology · Data mining · Machine learning · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI · Psychology · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Artificial Intelligence

  • Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python

    Open Access•Wes Mckinney•Proceedings of the Python in…•2010

  • Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey

    Open Access•Eirini Ntoutsi, Pavlos Fafalios et al.•WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge…•2020

  • Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness

    Open Access•Sam Corbett-Davies, Sam Corbett‐Davies et al.•Proceedings of the 23rd ACM…•2017

  • Fuzzy cognitive maps

    Open Access•Bart Kosko•International Journal of…•1986

  • Conservative AI and social inequality

    Open Access•M Zajko•AI & Society•2021

  • Are AI systems biased against the poor? A machine learning analysis using Word2Vec and GloVe embeddings

    Open Access•Georgina Curto, Mario Jojoa et al.•AI & Society•2024

  • Artificial intelligence and the future of work - lessons from the sociology of expectations

    Open Access•Lilla Vicsek•International Journal of…•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae