A theory-driven model of handshape similarity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20399747 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Keane (University of Chicago, corresponding author), Zed Sevcikova Sehyr (0000-0001-7912-5428, San Diego State University, corresponding author), Karen Emmorey (0000-0002-5647-0066, San Diego State University, corresponding author), D Brentari (0000-0002-1233-8688, University of Chicago, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 221-241 |
| Publication date | 2017-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Phonology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0952-6757 • E-ISSN: 1469-8188 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0952675717000124 |
| OpenAlex | W2750025967 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
Following the Articulatory Model of Handshape (Keane 2014), which mathematically defines handshapes on the basis of joint angles, we propose two methods for calculating phonetic similarity: a contour difference method, which assesses the amount of change between handshapes within a fingerspelled word, and a positional similarity method, which compares similarity between pairs of letters in the same position across two fingerspelled words. Both methods are validated with psycholinguistic evidence based on similarity ratings by deaf signers. The results indicate that the positional similarity method more reliably predicts native signer intuition judgements about handshape similarity. This new similarity metric fills a gap in the literature (the lack of a theory-driven similarity metric) that has been empty since effectively the beginning of sign-language linguistics
Cognitive science · Intuition · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Similitude · Computer Science · Hand Gesture Recognition Systems · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Mathematics · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Phonological Representation of the Sign
Sign Language and Linguistic Universals
American Sign Language
Beyond Power Calculations
An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants
Why We (Usually) Don't Have to Worry About Multiple Comparisons
Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R 2 GLMM to random slopes models
A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models
Working Memory for Sign Language
Multimodel Inference
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |