Averroes’ “Epistle on Divine Knowledge” as a Dialectical Work
Between Forbidden Interpretation and Philosophical Training
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20400124 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yehuda Halper (0000-0003-1829-9904, Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 119-137 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0957-4239 • E-ISSN: 1474-0524 |
| Publisher | Liverpool University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0957423923000127 |
| OpenAlex | W4391746428 |
| Language | EN |
Averroes’ “Epistle on Divine Knowledge” presents four different dialogues on two textual levels. These dialogues, the syllogistic structure of the arguments in them, and their use of contradictories indicate that the “Epistle on Divine Knowledge” is structured nearly entirely in accordance with the descriptions of dialectic we find in Averroes’ commentaries on Aristotle's Topica . Accordingly, Averroes’ solution to the question of how God can have universal knowledge of particular things is a dialectical account of the distinction between Divine and human knowledge. Moreover, at a crucial point in the “Epistle on Divine Knowledge” Averroes refers to Aristotle, Metaphysics Β, which he considers to a dialectical exposition of questions on metaphysics. This reference suggests that Averroes sees the “Epistle on Divine Knowledge” as a kind of dialectical inquiry aimed at answering questions that arise at the outset of studying metaphysics. So, while it is possible to view the “Epistle on Divine Knowledge” as a dialectical interpretation of Quran 67:14, its primary purpose is to introduce its readers to metaphysical speculation. Thus it does not violate Averroes’ legal prohibition given in the Decisive Treatise against declaring dialectical interpretations in books available to the general public
Dialectic · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Metaphysics · Reflexive pronoun · Syllogism · Families in Therapy and Culture · Islamic Thought and Society Studies · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|