Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

On Methodological Distinctions

Nomothetic Psychology, or Historical Understanding

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20400615
AutoresLeendert P Mos (University of Alberta, autor de correspondencia)
Año1998
Volumen8
Número1
Páginas39-57
Fecha de publicación1998-02-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaTheory & Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0959-3543 • E-ISSN: 1461-7447
EditorialSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0959354398081003
OpenAlexW2094439613
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas9
Referencias citadas7

What follows is a critical review of Windelband's methodological distinction between nomothetic and idiographic thought as based on Lamiell's translation of Windelband's (1894/1998) `History and Natural Science'. This is followed by a critique of Lamiell's (1998) interpretation of the distinction and its implications for his proposed nomothetic psychology of personality. In the course of evaluating this proposal, Windelband's distinction is placed within the broader context of the neo-Kantian understanding of science, history and philosophy, and briefly contrasted with Dilthey's epistemological distinction between the human and natural sciences which takes psychology, and our understanding of individual persons, as belonging to the human, which is to say, historical sciences

Epistemology · Human science · Metatheory · Natural science · Nomothetic · Nomothetic and idiographic · Philosophy of science · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Representations and Identity

  • The long past and short history of the vocabulary of anglophone psychology

    John G Benjafield•History of Psychology•2011

  • Social approaches to energy transition cases in rural Italy, Indonesia and Australia

    Open Access•Mauro Sarrica, Max Richter et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • More Than Method

    Open Access•Gitte Sommer Harrits•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2011

  • Achieving influence

    Kurt P Benson, Elizabeth L Holloway•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2005

  • Between the General and the Unique

    Open Access•Salvatore, Sergio Salvatore et al.•Theory & Psychology•2010

  • Ten Years after, Decade to Come

    Open Access•H J Stam•Theory & Psychology•2000

  • In Defence of Verstehen and Erkliren

    Open Access•Austin Harrington•Theory & Psychology•2000

  • A cautionary note on aggregation in educational psychology and beyond

    Open Access•Georg Krammer•Theory & Psychology•2023

  • Parent–teacher meetings as a unit of analysis for parent–teacher interactions

    Open Access•Francesca Giovanna Maria Gastaldi, Claudio Longobardi et al.•Culture & Psychology•2015

  • Constructing the Subject

    Open Access•Kurt Danziger•Constructing the Subject•1990

  • History, Man, and Reason

    Open Access•Maurice Mandelbaum•History, Man, and Reason•2019

  • History and Natural Science

    Open Access•Wilhelm Windelband•Theory & Psychology•1998

  • Nomothetic' and `Idiographic'

    Open Access•James T Lamiell•Theory & Psychology•1998

  • The two disciplines of scientific psychology

    Lee J Cronbach•American Psychologist•1957

  • The Philosophy of the Enlightenment

    Ernst Cassirer•Philosophy of the Enlightenment•2009

Obras citantes distintas9
Citas por año0,35
Intervalo de citas2000 - 2023 (24)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 8
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae