Computational Psychology and Naturalism
A Comment on Looren de Jong
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20400978 |
|---|---|
| Authors | René van Hezewijk (0000-0001-7494-9495, Utrecht University, The Netherlands,) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 271-277 |
| Publication date | 1995-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory & Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-3543 • E-ISSN: 1461-7447 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0959354395052006 |
| OpenAlex | W2161551566 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
Looren de Jong traces Gibson's ecological approach to perception to the tradition of Heider and Brunswik, and from Gibson to Marr. In this commentary I first discuss the use of classifying traditions. Then I discuss Looren de Jong's classifications of naturalism and rationalism. I then argue that Marr's position is accordingly misrepresented
Cognitive science · Epistemology · Naturalism · Perception · Rationalism · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.03 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1995 - 1995 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |