Milgram’s shock experiments and the Nazi perpetrators

A contrarian perspective on the role of obedience pressures during the Holocaust

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20401538
AutoresAllan Fenigstein (Kenyon College, autor de correspondencia)
Año2015
Volumen25
Número5
Páginas581-598
Fecha de publicación2015-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaTheory & Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0959-3543 • E-ISSN: 1461-7447
EditorialSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0959354315601904
OpenAlexW2278221875
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas10
Referencias citadas33

In contrast to many scholars who believe that Milgram’s studies of obedience provide an incisive understanding of the Holocaust perpetrators, this article argues that pressures to obey authority had little role in the Holocaust. Unlike Milgram’s participants, most Nazi perpetrators showed no remorse or moral distress over the murders, severely compromising the explanatory necessity of obedience pressures; the excesses of the Nazis’ brutal and wanton cruelty, and the enthusiasm shown in the killing process, is entirely inconsistent with the behavior of the laboratory participants and with the concept of dutiful, but emotionless, obedience; and finally, when Milgram’s participants had the chance to evade giving shock, they frequently seized that opportunity; in contrast, although Nazi killers were often given the opportunity to withdraw from the killing operations, very few chose to do so. These arguments suggest that most of the Nazi perpetrators believed in what they were doing, and would have been willing, perhaps even eager to kill Jews, even in the absence of orders to do so

Criminology · Cruelty · Milgram experiment · Nazism · Obedience · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Remorse · Sociology · The Holocaust · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Psychology · Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment