Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fodor, Cherniak and the Naturalization of Rationality

Bibliographic Data

ID20401546
AuthorsDan L Chiappe (University of Toronto), Dan Chiappe (0000-0002-5496-701X, University of Toronto), John Vervaeke (0000-0001-6792-2737, University of Toronto)
Year1997
Volume7
Issue6
Pages799-821
Publication date1997-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory & Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0959-3543 • E-ISSN: 1461-7447
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0959354397076004
OpenAlexW2079779210
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited15

This paper explores the question of whether rationality can be explained. We begin by discussing Fodor's sceptical view, together with some retorts by Philip Cam and Dan Dennett. Next we outline Chemiak's theory of minimal rationality, which claims to rescue central systems from inexplicability. We argue that Chemiak comes to his conclusion about the possibility of an explanation of rationality by misconstruing the task for psychology. There is an axiological and a deontic sense of rationality, and psychology has to explain our competence for realizing the deontic sense, not merely how we manage to satisfy the axiological criteria for rationality, as Chemiak maintains. We conclude by showing that Chemiak has failed to provide such a theory. Moreover, we argue that it is unlikely that a naturalistic explanation of rationality is even possible. Explanations have to presuppose rationality, such that we cannot get beyond the Veil of Reason to explain the naturalistic genesis of rationality. Nonetheless, we maintain that much psychological work on rationality is possible, subject to the constraint that the determination of relevance is taken as a primitive operation

Deontic logic · Ecological rationality · Epistemology · Great Rationality Debate · Naturalization · Rationality · Skepticism · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology

  • Metaphor, Modularity, and the Evolution of Conceptual Integration

    Dan L Chiappe, Dan Chiappe•Metaphor and Symbol•2000

  • Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication

    Open Access•Dan Chiappe•Journal of Pragmatics•2000

  • Ten Years after, Decade to Come

    Open Access•H J Stam•Theory & Psychology•2000

  • How (far) can rationality be naturalized

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer, Thomas Sturm•Synthese•2012

  • Computation and Cognition

    Zenon W Pylyshyn•Computation and Cognition•1984

  • The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations

    Open Access•Dan Sperber•Mapping the Mind•1994

  • Concepts of Epistemic Justification

    William P Alston, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1985

  • On narrow norms and vague heuristics

    Gerd Gigerenzer•Psychological Review•1996

  • On the psychology of prediction.

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Psychological Review•1973

  • The Modularity of Mind

    Jerry A Fodor•Modularity of Mind•1983

  • Naturalism and Rationality

    Christopher Hookway•QUINE. Naturalized Epistemology,…•2000

  • Essays on Actions and Events

    Donald Davidson, Donald Herbert Davidson•Essays on actions and events•2001

  • Special sciences (or

    Open Access•J A Fodor•Synthese•1974

  • What Is It Like to Be a Bat

    Thomas Nagel•The Philosophical Review•1974

  • The Rediscovery of the Mind

    John R Searle•The rediscovery of the mind•1992

Citations per year0.15
Citation span2000 - 2012 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae