Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Operationism again

What Did Bridgman Say? What Did Bridgman Need

Bibliographic Data

ID20401917
AuthorsChristopher D Green (0000-0002-6027-6709, York University, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume11
Issue1
Pages45-51
Publication date2001-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory & Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0959-3543 • E-ISSN: 1461-7447
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0959354301111003
OpenAlexW2031030458
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited7

Grace's (2001) critical analysis of the use of operationism in psychology is founded on two basic claims. First, he argues that the main difficulty with mid-20th-century psychologists' interpretation of Bridgman was that they believed a single operation to be sufficient to define a new concept. Second, he claims that the main thrust of recent criticisms of operationism is that operational definitions should be used for existing concepts only and not to create new ones. In his view, both the earlier difficulty and the recent criticism are effectively quashed by the adoption of `convergent operationism', first proposed in the 1950s. In the present commentary, I try to show that neither of the basic claims is quite correct, nor does `convergent operationism' do much to resolve the matter. The primary difficulty with operationism, in contrast to Grace's analysis of the situation, was that it was proposed as a solution to a metaphysical problem which it was not even remotely adequate to meet, and, in addition, that the presumed metaphysical problem it was intended to solve was, in the first place, a mistaken diagnosis of the difficulties that faced science in the 1920s, when operationism was first proposed

Criticism · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Political science · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Law · Philosophy · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Representations and Identity

  • The Problem of Coordination and the Pursuit of Structural Constraints in Psychology

    Open Access•David Kellen, Clintin P Davis‐Stober et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2021

  • The Pragmatics of Operationism

    Open Access•Randolph C Grace•Theory & Psychology•2001

  • Operationism in psychology

    Open Access•Uljana Feest•Journal of the History of the…•2005

  • Operationism and the concept of perception.

    Wendell R Garner, Harold W Hake et al.•Psychological Review•1956

  • On the Failure of Operationism

    Open Access•Randolph C Grace•Theory & Psychology•2001

  • Of Immortal Mythological Beasts

    Open Access•Christopher D Green•Theory & Psychology•1992

  • Psychology's Bridgman vs Bridgman's Bridgman

    Open Access•Sigmund Koch•Theory & Psychology•1992

  • Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

    Donald T Campbell, Donald W Fiske•Psychological Bulletin•1959

  • Construct validity in psychological tests

    Lee J Cronbach, Paul E Meehl•Psychological Bulletin•1955

Citations per year0.12
Citation span2001 - 2021 (21)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae