Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scientists can’t do science alone, they need publics

Bibliographic Data

ID20402799
AuthorsJean-Baptiste Gouyon (0000-0003-2379-0853, University College London (UCL), UK, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume25
Issue6
Pages754-757
Publication date2016-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Understanding of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-6625 • E-ISSN: 1361-6609
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0963662516650361
PMID27225274
OpenAlexW2405974714
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited11

In the spirit of Massimiano Bucchi's inaugural editorial in this journal (Bucchi, 2016), this short piece is intended as a glance to past PUS scholarship, in order to feed in current debates taking place in the field.For this first 'historical moment in PUS', I have chosen to focus on the year 1985, and what some of the literature published that year can tell us about the phrase 'science in public'.It has become customary, at least in the UK, to have historical accounts of the PUS movement begin in 1985, mostly down to the fact that 1985 saw the publication of the Royal Society's report on the public understanding of science, a.k.aBodmer Report, which many consider to have provided the PUS movement with its initial impetus, at least an institutional one (The Royal Society, 1985). 1 The report prompted a few healthy scholarly reactions in the years following its publication, but if it were for this report alone, 1985 should not be that memorable.However, at least two volumes appeared this very same year, Shinn & Whitley's Expository Science (Shinn & Whitley, 1985) and Shapin & Schaffer's Leviathan and the air pump (Shapin & Schaffer, 1985), both highlighting the communicative facet of science-making to argue that audiences for science play an active role in knowledge production.Finally, looking at some post-1985 scholarship shows that the 1 For a comprehensive discussion of the production, contents and consequences of the report, see Simon Jay Lock, 2008

Biology · Citizen science · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Public awareness of science · Public relations · Publics · Science communication · Science education · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · International Science and Diplomacy · Law · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • The BBC’s Controversy and the politics of audience participation

    Open Access•Rupert Cole•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • Communicating science through films

    Open Access•Simone Casini, P Magaudda et al.•Science as Culture•2024

  • The Changing Nature of Modernization Discourses in Documentary Films

    Open Access•Carlos Tabernero, Carlos Tabernero Holgado•Science in Context•2018

  • Introduction

    Open Access•F Vidal•Science in Context•2018

  • Seismic noise to public health signal

    Open Access•Abril Saldaña-Tejeda, Xyoli Pérez-Campos et al.•Tapuya Latin American Science…•2022

  • When scientists turn to the public

    Open Access•Massimiano Bucchi•Public Understanding of Science•1996

  • About misunderstandings about misunderstandings

    Open Access•Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond•Public Understanding of Science•1992

  • Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers

    Richard Whitley•Expository Science•1985

  • Sheepfarming after Chernobyl

    Brian Wynne•Environment Science and Policy…•1989

  • From Fax to Facts

    Open Access•Bruce V Lewenstein•Social Studies of Science•1995

  • Pandora's hope

    Bruno Latour•Pandora's hope•1999

  • Misunderstood misunderstanding

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Public Understanding of Science•1992

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,56
Citation span2017 - 2024 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae