Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Jonathan M.G. Perry , Adam Hartstone‐Rose , Jennifer A. Parkinson , Taylor Criste
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21205, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy The University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia SC 29209, Emergency Department Ohio Valley Hospital Kennedy Township PA 15136
ANO 2015
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Journal of Physical Anthropology
ISSN 0002-9483
E-ISSN 1096-8644
EDITORA Berghahn Journals (United Kingdom)
DOI 10.1002/ajpa.22726
CITAÇÕES 6
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 babf5c15a880f5a19a3d86d7664e176c

Resumo

Previously we found that Maximum Ingested Bite Size (Vb)—the largest piece of food that an animal will ingest whole without biting first—scales isometrically with body size in 17 species of strepsirrhines at the Duke Lemur Center (DLC). However, because this earlier study focused on only three food types (two with similar mechanical properties), it did not yield results that were easily applied to describing the broad diets of these taxa. Expressing Vb in terms of food mechanical properties allows us to compare data across food types, including foods of wild lemurs, to better understand dietary adaptations in lemurs. To this end, we quantified Vb in five species of lemurs at the DLC representing large and small frugivores and folivores using ten types of food that vary widely in stiffness and toughness to determine how these properties relate to bite sizes. We found that although most species take smaller bites of stiffer foods, this negative relationship was not statistically significant across the whole sample. However, there is a significant relationship between bite size and toughness. All three of the more frugivorous taxa in our sample take significantly smaller bites of tougher foods. However, the two more folivorous lemurs do not. They take small bites for all foods. This suggests that the species most adapted to the consumption of tough foods do not modulate their ingestive sizes to accommodate larger pieces of weak foods. Am J Phys Anthropol 157:513–518, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ferramentas