Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Daniel Schmitt , Michael C. Granatosky , Anne‐Claire Fabre , Jandy B. Hanna
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Department of Evolutionary Anthropology Duke University Durham North Carolina, Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy University of Chicago Chicago Illinois, Department of Biomedical Science West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine Lewisburg West Virginia
ANO 2018
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Journal of Physical Anthropology
ISSN 0002-9483
E-ISSN 1096-8644
EDITORA Berghahn Journals (United Kingdom)
DOI 10.1002/ajpa.23688
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 affadb664e2d8154d505cdd17c411a5b

Resumo

ObjectivesIn this study, we explore whether ground reaction forces recorded during horizontal walking co‐vary with the shape of the long bones of the forelimb in strepsirrhines. To do so, we quantify (1) the shape of the shaft and articular surfaces of each long bone of the forelimb, (2) the peak vertical, mediolateral, and horizontal ground reaction forces applied by the forelimb during arboreal locomotion, and (3) the relationship between the shape of the forelimb and peak forces.Materials and methodsGeometric morphometric approaches were used to quantify the shape of the bones. Kinetic data were collected during horizontal arboreal walking in eight species of strepsirrhines that show variation in habitual substrate use and morphology of the forelimb. These data were then used to explore the links between locomotor behavior, morphology, and mechanics using co‐variation analyses in a phylogenetic framework.ResultsOur results show significant differences between slow quadrupedal climbers (lorises), vertical clinger and leapers (sifaka), and active arboreal quadrupeds (ring‐tailed lemur, ruffed lemur) in both ground reaction forces and the shape of the long bones of the forelimb, with the propulsive and medially directed peak forces having the highest impact on the shape of the humerus. Co‐variation between long bone shape and ground reaction forces was detected in both the humerus and ulna even when accounting for differences in body mass.DiscussionThese results demonstrate the importance of considering limb‐loading beyond just peak vertical force, or substrate reaction force. A re‐evaluation of osseous morphology and functional interpretations is necessary in light of these findings.

Ferramentas