Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) M.D. D'Angelo del Campo , Rolando González-José , Antonio Vargas , María Dolores Marrodán , Laura Medialdea , Cayetana Bazaco , Carlos Sierra‐Martínez
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Laboratorio de Poblaciones del Pasado (LAPP), Departamento de Biología Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) Madrid Spain, Instituto Patagónico de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, Centro Nacional Patagónico (CENPAT‐CONICET) Puerto Madryn Chubut Argentina, Technical Department Action Against Hunger Foundation (AAH) Madrid Spain, Grupo de investigación EPINUT, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Biodiversidad Ecología y Evolución, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) Madrid Spain
ANO 2019
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Journal of Physical Anthropology
ISSN 0002-9483
E-ISSN 1096-8644
EDITORA Berghahn Journals (United Kingdom)
DOI 10.1002/ajpa.23779
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 d7240c38d21f3e9ea85c14bc567d720e

Resumo

IntroductionLarge shape variations take place during the growth process of children, including quantitative mass and size increase plus qualitative changes in their body shape. The aim of the present study is to apply Geometric Morphometric techniques in order to visualize and quantify such body shape differences in healthy children aged 6–59 months with optimal nutritional status.Materials and methodsAnthropometrical measurements of weight, height, and middle‐upper arm circumference were used to assess nutritional status on a sample of 258 Senegalese (n = 154) and Spanish (n = 104) children. A set of 36 anatomical and/or osteologically‐based landmarks were identified on the body of the children along with 108 semi‐landmarks used to capture curvature attributes on the frontal view of the body image. A specific method was developed to place and photograph children, as well as to locate landmarks, treat images and calculate semi‐landmarks. Shape differences among children were analyzed in terms of age, sex, and population origin, taking into consideration allometry effects.ResultsOur results indicate significant differences in shape and size for all the three factors under study before removing size effect (p < .0001), and in shape after the size correction (p < .01). Only the ontogenetic effect persisted in the size of studied individuals after size‐effects correction (p < .0001). Morphometric significant differences were described regarding age for PC1 and population origin in PC2 before removing size effect. Between‐population morphometric differences were sorted along PC1 after size correction.DiscussionGeometric Morphometric techniques are useful to study morphometric changes in the anterior whole‐body view of children under 5 years old, allowing a precise description of shape changes observed when age and population origin are considered.

Ferramentas