The development of ecommists’ policy advice in New Zealand, 1930–34
With particular reference to Belshaw’s contribution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20436842 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A M Endres (Department of Economics, University of Auckland Private Bag Auckland-1 New Zealand, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 64-78 |
| Publication date | 1990-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Economic History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-8992 • E-ISSN: 1467-8446 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/aehr.301004 |
| OpenAlex | W2790969534 |
| Language | EN |
Policy–makers initially followed early Canterbury School prescriptions that favoured immediate budget balance and the rapid deflation of internal prices and wages. The 1932 Economic Committee formed a consensus favouring a policy package which had originally been formulated by Copland and Belshaw, and which included, inter alia , the gradual achievement of budget balance and the adjustment of external prices through exchange rate devaluation. A conservative Treasury line propounded by Park and Murphy emphasized sole reliance on deflationary measures but fell out of favour after 1933. Fisher’s long–run perspective did not appeal to policy–makers concerned with an immediate economic crisis
Appeal · Balance (ability) · Deflation · Devaluation · Economics · Exchange rate · Fell · Geography · Inflation (cosmology) · Macroeconomics · Monetary policy · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Treasury · Australian History and Society · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |