‘Economic rationalism’ in Canberra and Canada
Public sector reorganisation, politics, and power
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20437616 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Herman Schwartz (0000-0002-5571-3644, University of Virginia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45-65 |
| Publication date | 2003-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Economic History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-8992 • E-ISSN: 1467-8446 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/0004-8992.00040 |
| OpenAlex | W2012776054 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Australian public sector institutions and public sector labour relations experienced intense change during the 1980s and 1990s. Proponents of restructuring sought to insert market‐like pressures into areas formerly governed by bureaucratic mechanisms. This reversed a trend towards continual growth in state provision of non‐market based social protection and social welfare, and continual growth in the public sector's share of the economy. The politics and content of Australian public sector restructuring under Labor and then the Liberals substantially resembled restructuring efforts in two Canadian provinces. In all three examples, political pacts between unions in the exposed and non‐exposed sectors, and between organised labour and capital, determined the direction of change. But the level of institutional robustness of these various actors determined both the pace and effectiveness of change. Weak employer organisations and unions incapable of sustaining pacts in Canada produced wider oscillations in policy content that attained less substantive success than in Australia
Bureaucracy · Economics · Economy · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public sector · Restructuring · Australian History and Society · Labor Movements and Unions · Political and Economic history of UK and US
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |