The judicial development of the Roman-Dutch doctrine of parental authority in South African law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20444565 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lawrence Schäfer (0009-0005-9390-9815, 1Senior lecturer in law; Oxford Brookes University, Department of Law, Headington Hill Hall, Oxford 0X3 OBP, England, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 133-153 |
| Publication date | 2008-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-7585 • E-ISSN: 1571-8190 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/157181908x277590 |
| OpenAlex | W1995757907 |
| Language | EN |
The Roman-Dutch doctrine of parental authority differed markedly from the parallel doctrine in English common law, particularly in relation to the balance of power between parents and generally in relation to illegitimate children. This paper traces the judicial development of the Roman-Dutch doctrine by the South African courts and focuses on two important turning points, at which the unnecessary adoption of principles of English law resulted in a departure from Roman-Dutch principles. The product of this judicial development was a doctrine of parental authority that differentiated sharply between legitimate and illegitimate children, and greatly impeded the capacity of judges to apply the 'best interests' principle in disputes concerning the latter
Balance (ability) · Common law · Doctrine · English law · Judicial review · Political science · Power (physics) · Relation (database) · Sociology · Comparative and International Law Studies · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|