Ἀποκρίματα und die Kaiserkonstitutionen
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20445217 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna Plisecka (Stipendiatin des Schweizerischen Nationalfonds, Universität Zürich, Rechtswissenschaftliches Institut, Rämistrasse 74/57, CH-8001 Zürich, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 166-191 |
| Publication date | 2017-06-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-7585 • E-ISSN: 1571-8190 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15718190-08512p07 |
| OpenAlex | W2728737835 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The article presents an attempt to comprehend the ἀποκρίματα within the system of Roman imperial constitutions. Whereas it is generally assumed, that the ἀποκρίματα were identical with the subscripts, it is argued that they constituted a kind of imperial enactment sui generis , which cannot be identified with any of the known types of constitutions. We find the term ἀπόκριμα, which had no technical meaning until the end of the second century, being used with a consistent connotation only after the visit of Septimius Severus and Caracalla to Egypt. Furthermore, it refers specifically to the group of decisions, which the both emperors have issued in Alexandria during that visit
Ancient history · Connotation · Epistemology · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Political science · Term (time) · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |