Albert, Aquinas, and Dionysius
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20458996 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David B Burrell (0000-0001-6117-386X, University of Notre Dame), David Burrell, Isabelle Moulin (0000-0003-1860-4542, Yahoo (United Kingdom)) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 633-649 |
| Publication date | 2008-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern Theology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0266-7177 • E-ISSN: 1468-0025 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00490.x |
| OpenAlex | W2027538318 |
| Language | EN |
Beyond the usual distinction between East and West, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas stand not only as commentators, but also appear to be close readers, of Dionysius' works. While Albert's own metaphysics of the Good tends to underline the diffusive dimension of the Good in a creation conceived of as an emanation, Thomas uses Dionysius to elaborate his notion of God as a free creator and to define His unique relation to creatures. If Albert's own via negativa is closer to Dionysius than one might have expected, it nonetheless stands within the same scope as Thomas' conception of proximity to God, as they both borrow the Dionysian exitus/reditus pattern to offer a divinization process of salvation through peace and praise
Art · Creatures · Epistemology · Literature · Metaphysics · Praise · Theology · History · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Medieval Literature and History · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|