Making Deep Reasonings Public
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20459141 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Adams (0000-0003-2748-4650, New College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 385-401 |
| Publication date | 2006-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern Theology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0266-7177 • E-ISSN: 1468-0025 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-0025.2006.00324.x |
| OpenAlex | W2015022686 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
This essay makes six claims about the practice of scriptural reasoning. Scriptural reasoning does not try to ground its own possibility. It approaches metaphysics as an account of what is taken to be true, not as a means to demonstrate necessary truths. It relies on luck. It models a practice of learning traditions' languages. It promotes friendship above consensus and agreement. It is a practice of making deep reasonings public. In summary, scriptural reasoning is reparative reasoning which addresses the acute needs of today's society while seeming to refuse certain imperatives that often accompany the academy's approach to those needs
Common ground · Epistemology · Friendship · Luck · Metaphysics · Social science · Sociology · Philosophy · Psychology · Religious Education and Schools · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2017 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |