Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contemplating the One who Remains the Same

Augustine, Swinburne, and Psalm 102 on the Relation between Divine Immutability and Theological Reason

Bibliographic Data

ID20460502
AuthorsJared Michelson (0000-0002-2278-2520, University of St. Andrews, St. Mary’s, The School of Divinity St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9JU UK, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume36
Issue4
Pages803-825
Publication date2020-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Theology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0266-7177 • E-ISSN: 1468-0025
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/moth.12587
OpenAlexW2986906099
LanguageEN

This article defends a classical doctrine of divine immutability by contending that the most influential objections lodged against it by theologians and philosophers such as Richard Swinburne–i.e. that divine immutability is speculative rather than practical, is philosophical rather than biblical, and fails to cohere with a ‘personal’ God who relates to creatures–are rooted in a particular construal of theological reason. I diagnose Swinburne’s account of theological reason with the help of Karl Barth’s interpretation of Anselm, and put forth a contrasting account of divine immutability, rooted in a distinct approach to theological reason, through a theological interpretation of Psalm 102, an analysis of the Creator/creature distinction, and an examination of Augustine’s De trinitate

Creatures · Doctrine · Epistemology · Immutability · Theology · Augustinian Studies and Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · History · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae