Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Two Examples of the Reconstruction of the Main Defense Line of Mangup Fortress in the Theme Period of Its History

Bibliographic Data

ID20466945
AuthorsValery Naumenko (0000-0002-2590-6314, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume50
Pages165-184
Publication date2022-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueАнтичная древность и средние века (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0320-4472 • E-ISSN: 2687-0398
PublisherUral Federal University (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.15826/adsv.2022.50.011
OpenAlexW4312267998
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The Theme Period in the history of Mangup dates from 841 to the mid-eleventh century. For the first time in many years of archaeological researches at the site, recent excavations revealed two major repairs of the defensive structures of the fortress. These works date from the periods far from each other, and namely the mid-ninth century and the late tenth century; therefore, one may assume that the local Byzantine administration permanently paid attention to the defence capacity of the fortress. The mid-ninth century repair, which traces have been documented by the studies of the fortification A.XI in Tabana-dere ravine, occurred as a consequence of the inclusion of Mangup fortress into the Byzantine theme, established in Taurica in no later than 841. There was a significant reconstruction of the original defensive line, which was erected in the final years of Emperor Justinian I (527–565). The late tenth-­century repair was of a larger scale and had an exact date, no later than 994–995. It is mentioned in the building inscription showing the name of Topoteretes Tzoulas, which survived in situ in the masonry of a fortification tower in Tabana-dere ravine. These works resulted in the radical reconstruction of at least two key fortifications at the northern front of the fortress defence, fortifications A.XI and A.XIV located on the slope of Chufut-­Cheargan-­burun promontory. The reconstruction of two important fortifications of Mangup in the late tenth century was not an accident: it fit well into the general context of the military and political history of the Crimea in the period under study. Most likely, it was the case of the purposeful strengthening of Mangup fortress after the establishment of the tourmarchia of Gothia in the mountainous Crimea and as the centre of the military-­administrative unit. In this connection, Topoteretes Tzoulas, mentioned in the 994–995 inscription, who supervised the fortification works, should be considered both the commandant of a remote Byzantine fortress and also an officer of importance, who was directly subordinated to the tourmarches of Gothia, thus following the widespread administrative practice of tenth-­century Byzantium

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Byzantine architecture · Emperor · Ninth · Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies · Byzantine Studies and History · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History

  • Tourmarchia of Gothia and Byzantine Topoterete at Mangup at the End of the 10th Early of the 11th Centuries

    Open Access•Valery Naumenko•Vestnik Volgogradskogo…•2023

  • Searching the Khazars in Mangup

    Open Access•Valery Naumenko•Античная древность и средние века•2024

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae