Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Equivalence between Computer and Booklet Administrations of the New Japanese Version of the MMPI

Bibliographic Data

ID20472176
AuthorsMasune Sukigara (Nagoya City College of Child Education, corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume56
Issue4
Pages570-584
Publication date1996-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational and Psychological Measurement (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-1644 • E-ISSN: 1552-3888
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0013164496056004002
OpenAlexW2042239044
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited12

The New Japanese Version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) was administered twice at an interval of 7 days to female college students in order to verify the equivalence of the computer- (C) and booklet-administered (B) formats. Two hundred subjects completed one or both measures in one of four groups: C/B, B/C, C/C, and B/B. Each group was composed of 50 subjects. ANOVAs were applied to the raw scale scores of the C/B and B/C groups. On the D, Pa, Pt, and Sc scales, the scores on the computer were statistically significanfly higher than those on the booklet administration. This result differed from the results of the previous studies. This might be attributed to the language and software used for computerization. The correlations between the formats were slighdly lower than or equal to their test-retest reliability coefficients. The computerized MMPI did not save administration time, which may have been due to the software specifications

Analysis of variance · Discrete mathematics · Equivalence (formal languages) · Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory · Personality · Psychometrics · Raw data · Raw score · Repeated measures design · Scale (ratio) · Statistics · Test (biology) · Clinical Psychology · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Mathematics · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys

    Open Access•D Dodou, J C F de Winter•Computers in Human Behavior•2014

  • A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)

    Open Access•Frans Pouwer, Frank J Snoek et al.•Quality of Life Research•1997

  • Reliability Generalization

    Open Access•Tammi Vacha-Haase, Tammi Vacha‐haase et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2001

  • Studying the Equivalence of Computer-Delivered and Paper-Based Administrations of the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test

    Open Access•Alvaro J Arce-Ferrer, Elvira Martínez Guzmán•Educational and Psychological…•2009

  • Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups

    James L Rogers, Kenneth I Howard et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1993

Citations per year0.14
Citation span1997 - 2014 (18)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae