Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Deontological sceptical theism proved

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20475629
AutoresPerry C Hendricks (0000-0002-9753-6914, Purdue University West Lafayette, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen60
Número2
Páginas244-257
Fecha de publicación2023-04-19
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaReligious Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X
EditorialCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/s0034412523000318
OpenAlexW4366392451
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas54

In this article, I argue that sceptical theists have too narrow a focus: they consider only God's axiological reasons, ignoring any non-axiological reasons he may have. But this is a mistake: predicting how God will act requires knowing about his reasons in general , and this requires knowing about both God's axiological and non-axiological reasons. In light of this, I construct and defend a kind of sceptical theism – Deontological Sceptical Theism – that encompasses all of God's reasons, and briefly illustrate how it renders irrelevant certain charges of excessive sceptical and how it evaporates equiprobability objections. Furthermore, I put forth a simple argument in favour of Deontological Sceptical Theism, which shows that everyone (at least currently) ought to endorse it

Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Mistake · Political science · Skepticism · Theism · Chemistry · Law · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

  • Skeptical Theism and the Problem of Evil

    Michael Bergmann•The Oxford handbook of…•2009

  • Providence and the Problem of Evil

    Richard Swinburne•Providence and the problem of evil•1998

  • The Distinction between Justifying and Requiring

    Joshua Gert•Weighing Reasons•2016

  • Skeptical Theism Proved

    Open Access•Perry C Hendricks•Journal of the American…•2020

  • The Nonconsequentialist Argument from Evil

    Open Access•Justin Mooney•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • The dual scale model of weighing reasons

    Open Access•Chris Tucker•Noûs•2022

  • A new cosmological argument

    Open Access•Richard M Gale, Alexander R Pru et al.•Religious Studies•1999

  • The evil-god challenge

    Open Access•Stephen Law•Religious Studies•2010

  • Sceptical theism and the evil-god challenge

    Open Access•Perry Hendricks, Perry C Hendricks•Religious Studies•2018

  • Sceptical theism and divine lies

    Open Access•Erik J Wielenberg•Religious Studies•2010

  • The Kalam Cosmological Argument

    William Lane Craig•Philosophy of Religion•2001

  • Rossian Minimalism

    Open Access•Ned Markosian•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2010

  • What We Owe to Each Other

    T M Scanlon, Thomas Scanlon•What We Owe to Each Other•2000

  • Against Moral Dilemmas

    Earl Conee•The Philosophical Review•1982

  • Moral Worth, Supererogation, and the Justifying/Requiring Distinction

    Joshua Gert•The Philosophical Review•2012

  • Moral Dilemmas and Consistency in Ethics

    Open Access•Terrance Mcconnell, Terrance C McConnell•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•1978

  • The humean obstacle to evidential arguments from suffering

    Open Access•Stephen J Wykstra•International Journal for…•1984

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae