Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The role of non-connective discourse cues and their interaction with connectives

Dados Bibliográficos

ID20484170
AutoresLudivine Crible (0000-0001-6300-2765, UCLouvain), Vera Demberg (0000-0002-8834-0020, Saarland University)
Ano2020
Volume27
Fascículo2
Páginas313-338
Data de publicação2020-12-31
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPragmatics & Cognition (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0929-0907 • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
EditoraJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/pc.20003.cri
OpenAlexW3154943736
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas30

The disambiguation and processing of coherence relations is often investigated with a focus on explicit connectives, such as but or so . Other, non-connective cues from the context also facilitate discourse inferences, although their precise disambiguating role and interaction with connectives have been largely overlooked in the psycholinguistic literature so far. This study reports on two crowdsourcing experiments that test the role of contextual cues (parallelism, antonyms, resultative verbs) in the disambiguation of contrast and consequence relations. We compare the effect of contextual cues in conceptually different relations, and with connectives that differ in their semantic precision. Using offline tasks, our results show that contextual cues significantly help disambiguating contrast and consequence relations in the absence of connectives. However, when connectives are present in the context, the effect of cues only holds if the connective is acceptable in the target relation. Overall, our study suggests that cues are decisive on their own, but only secondary in the presence of connectives. These results call for further investigation of the complex interplay between connective types, contextual cues, relation types and other linguistic and cognitive factors

Cognitive psychology · Linguistics · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Michael Stevens•Journal of Cognition•2018

  • Rhetorical Structure Theory

    William C Mann, Scott A Thompson et al.•Third Text•1988

  • Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

    Open Access•R Harald Baayen, D J Davidson et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • When Do We Leave Discourse Relations Underspecified? The Effect of Formality and Relation Type

    Open Access•Ludivine Crible, Vera Demberg•Discours•2020

  • Temporal connectives and verbal tenses as processing instructions

    Cristina Grisot, Joanna Blochowiak•Pragmatics & Cognition•2017

  • Connectives and frame theory

    Eliza Kitis•Pragmatics & Cognition•2000

  • The emergence of Dutch connectives; how cumulative cognitive complexity explains the order of acquisition

    Open Access•Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, V V Riapolov et al.•Journal of Child Language•2009

  • The differential linguistic realization of comparative and additive coherence relations

    Open Access•Henk Pander Maat•Cognitive Linguistics•1999

  • Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation

    Open Access•Ted Sanders, Wilbert Spooren et al.•Cognitive Linguistics•1993

  • The processing of underspecified coherence relations

    Wilbert Spooren•Discourse Processes•1997

  • Connectives as Processing Signals

    Gerdineke van Silfhout, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul et al.•Discourse Processes•2015

  • The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing

    Ted J M Sanders, Ted Sanders et al.•Discourse Processes•2000

  • Compensating for processing difficulty in discourse

    Ludivine Crible, Martin J Pickering•Discourse Processes•2020

  • Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations

    Alistair Knott, Robert Dale•Discourse Processes•1994

  • Weak and Strong Discourse Markers in Speech, Chat, and Writing

    Ludivine Crible•Discourse Processes•2020

  • Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse, Beyond Discourse Markers

    Debopam Das, M Taboada•Discourse Processes•2018

  • Semantic constraints on relevance

    Open Access•Diane Blakemore•Lingua•1988

  • Predicting contrast in sentences with and without focus marking

    Open Access•Katy Carlson•Lingua•2014

  • Cognitive complexity and the linguistic marking of coherence relations

    Open Access•Jet Hoek, Sandrine Zufferey et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2017

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae