Robotics, philosophy and the problems of autonomy
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 20484248 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Willem F G Haselager (Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information (NICI), autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2005 |
| Volumen | 13 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 515-532 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2005-12-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Pragmatics & Cognition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0929-0907 • E-ISSN: 1569-9943 |
| Editorial | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/pc.13.3.07has |
| OpenAlex | W2170429928 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 14 |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
Robotics can be seen as a cognitive technology, assisting us in understanding various aspects of autonomy. In this paper I will investigate a difference between the interpretations of autonomy that exist within robotics and philosophy. Based on a brief review of some historical developments I suggest that within robotics a technical interpretation of autonomy arose, related to the independent performance of tasks. This interpretation is far removed from philosophical analyses of autonomy focusing on the capacity to choose goals for oneself. This difference in interpretation precludes a straightforward debate between philosophers and roboticists about the autonomy of artificial and organic creatures. In order to narrow the gap I will identify a third problem of autonomy, related to the issue of what makes one’s goals genuinely one’s own. I will suggest that it is the body, and the ongoing attempt to maintain its stability, that makes goals belong to the system. This issue could function as a suitable focal point for a debate in which work in robotics can be related to issues in philosophy. Such a debate could contribute to a growing awareness of the way in which our bodies matter to our autonomy
Autonomy · Cognitive science · Creatures · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Philosophy of mind · Philosophy of science · Philosophy of technology · Political science · Robot · Robotics · Sociology · Computer Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · History · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Philosophy · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Artificial autonomous agents and the question of electronic personhood
Aristotle, autonomy and the explanation of behaviour
Attitudes Toward Robots as Equipment and Coworkers and the Impact of Robot Autonomy Level
Personal Robots, Appearance, and Human Good
Distribution of Forward-Looking Responsibility in the EU Process on AI Regulation
When the action is “hybrid”–ethical challenges of the emerging technologies in the operating room
Ethicisation and Reliance on Ethics Expertise
Safety by simulation
The autonomy-safety-paradox of service robotics in Europe and Japan
Drones, robots and perceived autonomy
Seeming autonomy, technology and the uncanny valley
There is a problem, but not a responsibility gap
Make Way for the Robots! Human- and Machine-Centricity in Constituting a European Public–Private Partnership
Between Meanings and Senses-Making Spaces
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,74 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2007 - 2026 (20) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 12 |