Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On comprehending adjectival antonyms and negation

Revisiting negation as mitigation in Persian

Bibliographic Data

ID20484355
AuthorsRamin Golshaie (0000-0001-7300-6727, Alzahra University), Sara Incera (0000-0001-9124-9204, Eastern Kentucky University), Samira Ghaffarzadeh (Alzahra University)
Year2023
Volume30
Issue2
Pages296-329
Publication date2023-12-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePragmatics & Cognition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0929-0907 • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/pc.23001.gol
OpenAlexW4400554385
LanguageEN
References cited50

This study explores the extent to which comprehending negated antonyms in Persian involves the mitigation effect, whereby a negated word means less than its antonym. In two mouse-tracking experiments, participants rated sentences containing negated/non-negated scalar (e.g., tall-short ) and complementary (e.g., dead-alive ) antonymous adjectives on a continuous scale. Their reaction times and mouse movements were recorded by MouseTracker. The analysis of reaction times shows that negated adjectives are processed slower than their affirmative counterparts. Moreover, the analysis of mouse trajectories shows that complementary adjectives are rated further apart, closer to the endpoints of the scale than scalar adjectives. We also found that both complementary and scalar adjectives are mitigated under negation, but the mitigation effect is greater in scalar, rather than complementary, adjectives. The results speak in favor of a particular kind of mitigation effect, so-called negative strengthening, which causes negated antonyms to receive a strong pragmatic interpretation towards the opposite member of the pair

Linguistics · Natural language processing · Negation · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Lexicography and Language Studies · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy

  • Adjective Meaning and Scales

    Stephanie Solt•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Thoughts and Utterances

    Robyn Carston•Thoughts and Utterances•2002

  • Vagueness and grammar

    Open Access•Claire Kennedy, Christopher Kennedy•Linguistics and Philosophy•2007

  • Sentence comprehension

    Patricia A Carpenter, Marcel Adam Just•Psychological Review•1975

  • Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales

    Open Access•Luis Manuel Lozano Fernández, Luis M Lozano et al.•Methodology•2008

  • On the process of comparing sentences against pictures

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark, William G Chase•Cognitive Psychology•1972

  • Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors

    Open Access•Michael J Spivey, Marc Grosjean et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2005

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Antonyms in English

    Open Access•Steven Jones, M Lynne Murphy et al.•Antonyms in English•2012

  • Scalar Diversity

    Bob Van Tiel, Emiel van Miltenburg et al.•Journal of Semantics•2014

  • The polarity asymmetry of negative strengthening

    Open Access•Diana Mazzarella, Nicole Gotzner•Glossa a journal of general…•2021

  • Processing Negation in the Context of Adjectival Antonymy

    Open Access•Józef Maciuszek•Psychology of Language and…•2008

  • Scalar diversity and negative strengthening

    Open Access•Anton Benz, Carla Bombi et al.•ZAS Papers in Linguistics•2018

  • Asymmetric inference towards the antonym

    Open Access•Nicolas Ruytenbeek, Steven Verheyen et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2017

  • Response to Affirmative and Negative Binary Statements

    Open Access•P C Wason•British Journal of Psychology•1961

  • The meaning of negated adjectives

    Tamar Fraenkel, Yaacov Schul•Intercultural Pragmatics•2008

  • Total Adjectives vs. Partial Adjectives

    Open Access•Carmen Rotstein, Yoad Winter•Natural Language Semantics•2004

  • On Negation as Mitigation

    Rachel Giora, Ofer Fein et al.•Discourse Processes•2005

  • Negation in Context

    Rachel Giora, Ofer Fein et al.•Discourse Processes•2007

  • Not good” is “bad,” but “not bad” is not “good”

    Herbert L Colston•Discourse Processes•1999

  • On Horn's dilemma

    Open Access•Noel Burton-Roberts•Journal of Linguistics•1989

  • I am not guilty” vs “I am innocent”

    Open Access•Ruth Mayo, Yaacov Schul et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003

  • Adjectives and boundedness

    Open Access•Cheryl Paradis•Cognitive Linguistics•2001

  • Grammatical Aspect and Mental Activation of Implied Instruments

    Open Access•Ramin Golshaie, Sara Incera•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2021

  • Antonymy and negation-The boundedness hypothesis

    Open Access•Cheryl Paradis, Carita Paradis et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2006

  • A Natural history of negation

    Open Access•Eva Hajičová•Lingua•1990

  • Does understanding negation entail affirmation

    Open Access•Uri Hasson, Sam Glucksberg•Journal of Pragmatics•2006

  • Processing metalinguistic negation

    Eun-Ju Noh, Hyeree Choo et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Metalinguistic negation and echoic use

    Open Access•Robyn Carston•Journal of Pragmatics•1996

  • Anything negatives can do affirmatives can do just as well, except for some metaphors

    Open Access•Rachel Giora•Journal of Pragmatics•2006

  • Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates

    Open Access•Claire Kennedy, Christopher Kennedy et al.•Language•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae