Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Frankfurt and Cohen on bullshit, bullshiting, deception, lying, and concern with the truth of what one says

Bibliographic Data

ID20484382
AuthorsThomas L Carson (Loyola University Chicago, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume23
Issue1
Pages53-67
Publication date2016-09-29
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePragmatics & Cognition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0929-0907 • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/pc.23.1.03car
OpenAlexW2527034179
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited7

This paper addresses the following three claims that Frankfurt makes about the concept of bullshit: 1. Bullshit requires the intention to deceive others. 2. Bullshit does not constitute lying (bullshit is “short of lying”). 3. The essence of bullshit is lack of concern with the truth of what one says. I offer counterexamples to all three claims. By way of defending my counterexamples, I examine Cohen’s distinction between bullshiting and bullshit and argue that my examples are indeed cases of bullshiting that Frankfurt’s analysis is intended to cover. My examples of bullshitters who are very concerned to say only things that are true show that Frankfurt is mistaken in claiming that the “essence” of bullshit is lack of concern with the truth of what one says

Counterexample · Deception · Epistemology · Lying · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Aspects of a theory of bullshit

    Jörg Meibauer•Pragmatics & Cognition•2016

  • The incidence and context of vulgar language in peer-reviewed scientific literature

    Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh, Jaime A Teixeira Da Silva•Global Knowledge, Memory and…•2026

  • What's Wrong with Bullshit

    Open Access•Florian Cova•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2024

  • Large language models and their big bullshit potential

    Open Access•Sarah A Fisher•Ethics and Information Technology•2024

  • Se le lettere e la dottrina frutta mai nulla, ciò è in virtù non della verità, ma dell’impostura”. Sulla fertilità concettuale e altri aspetti rivelatori delle Bullshit come Dissoi Logoi

    Open Access•Simone Bernardi della Rosa•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2023

  • Bullshit, trust, and evidence

    Adrian Briciu•Intercultural Pragmatics•2021

  • On bullshit and lies

    Irati Zubia Landa•Intercultural Pragmatics•2025

  • Continuité et ruptures chez Cohen. À propos d’un livre de Nicholas Vrousalis

    Fabien Tarrit•Revue de philosophie économique•2023

  • A Multi-national Analysis of the Relationship Between Assimilation and Bullshit

    Open Access•Stephen M Croucher, Shawn M Condon et al.•Communication Studies•2026

  • Children’s endorsement of prosocial lies according to content and recipient knowledge

    Open Access•Shirley Ong, Elizabeth S Nilsen•First Language•2026

  • Why not everyone can afford to be a bullshitter

    Open Access•Irati Zubia Landa•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Ambiguous specificity

    Open Access•Gustav Meibauer•Politics•2021

  • The weaponization of language

    Open Access•Celine-Marie Pascale•Current Sociology•2019

  • Lying, Misleading, and What is Said

    Jennifer Saul, Jennifer Mather Saul•Lying Misleading And What Is Said…•2012

  • Lying and Deception

    Thomas L Carson•Lying and deception•2010

  • On Bullshit

    Harry G Frankfurt•On Bullshit•2005

Citations per year1.3
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae