John Hick's Theology of Religions and Inter-Religious Dialogue
A Critique
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20487448 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John R Meyer (1765 14th Avenue San Francisco, CA 94118 United States of America, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 274-297 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religion and Theology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1023-0807 • E-ISSN: 1574-3012 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/157430101x00134 |
| OpenAlex | W1978825594 |
| Language | EN |
While denying that belief in Jesus Christ is an essential element for personal salvation, John Hick presupposes Christian concepts of salvation. Even though he denies the universality of Christ vis-à-vis other world religions, the Christian doctrine of salvation is at the very heart of his project, albeit in a controversial form (as universal salvation or apocatastasis). I explore the influence of Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Schleiermacher in Hick's thought and discuss how his theology of religions and his concept of inter-religious dialogue are related to Christianity and yet are divorced from some of its central tenets
Christian theology · Christianity · Doctrine · History of religions · Philosophy of religion · Political science · Systematic theology · Theology · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Law · Philosophy · Religion, Theology, and Education · Religious studies · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Highly cited | No |
|---|