Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Post Mortem Makes a Difference

On a Redescription of Euhemerism and Its Place in the Study of Graeco-Roman Divine Kingship

Bibliographic Data

ID20487808
AuthorsNickolas P Roubekas (0000-0001-8537-0622, Department of Biblical and Ancient Studies, University of South AfricaP.O. Box 392, UNISA 0003Republic of South Africa, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume19
Issue3-4
Pages319-339
Publication date2012-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligion and Theology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1023-0807 • E-ISSN: 1574-3012
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/15743012-12341237
OpenAlexW2032377105
LanguageEN
References cited12

Euhemerus of Messene is one of the most popular ancient theorists of religion. In his now lost work Sacred Inscription he formulated a theory of religion by arguing that the Olympian gods were nothing more than prominent kings that were deified due to their benefactions to mankind. On the other hand, true divinity was to be found in the natural phenomena. However, this theory – known as euhemerism – has been (ab)used in many ways due to the different interpretative agendas of various authors and critics. In this paper I argue that euhemerism needs a new interpretation, a redescription, based primarily on a rereading of the text. In addition, by showing the different usages of the text by Euhemerus’s contemporaries and the early Christian writers, I argue that the connection of his theory with the practice of deification of kings in the Graeco-Roman world should be dismissed and reexamined by taking into account contemporary responses to his work that show that his theory was not meant as a justification for the deification of the Graeco-Roman kings

Archaeology · Art · Divinity · Epistemology · History of religions · Literature · Monarchy · Nothing · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Religious studies

  • Greek Religion

    Open Access•Jon D Mikalson•The Cambridge companion to the…•2006

  • Two Doxographical Notes

    Albert Henrichs•Harvard Studies in Classical…•1975

  • Bringing Chaos to Order

    Richard S Ascough, Richard Ascough•Religion and Theology•2008

  • Redescribing Graeco-Roman Antiquity

    Gerhard Van den Heever•Religion and Theology•2005

  • Euhemerus and the Historians

    Open Access•Truesdell S Brown•Harvard Theological Review•1946

  • Euhemerism

    John Cooke, John Daniel Cooke•Speculum•1927

  • Cretan Cults and Festivals

    Sterling Dow, R F Willetts•The Classical World•1962

  • Theories, Models and Concepts in Ancient History

    Neville Morley, Νeville Morley•Theories, Models and Concepts in…•2004

  • Lysimachus

    Helen S Lund•Lysimachus•2002

  • Religion in Hellenistic Athens

    Jon D Mikalson•Religion in Hellenistic Athens•1998

  • Coping With the Gods

    Open Access•H S Versnel, Henk Versnel•Coping With the Gods•2011

  • Diodorus Siculus and the First Century

    Karen Sacks, Kenneth S Sacks•Diodorus Siculus and the First…•1990

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae