Judges’ perspectives on Malaysia’s bilingual legal system

Bibliographic Data

ID20498583
AuthorsRichard Powell (0000-0002-4290-9015, Nihon University, corresponding author), Saw Tiong Guan (0000-0002-9870-0691, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
Year2022
Volume24
Issue1
Pages83-101
Publication date2022-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Englishes (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1348-8678 • E-ISSN: 2331-2548
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13488678.2021.1879536
OpenAlexW3130668879
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited10

Use-based Englishes may act as professional gatekeepers and working languages in Asian societies even where other languages of wider communication are prioritised. Legalese is widely regarded as particularly resistant to societal changes, and in Malaysian law English remains indispensable half a century after Malay became the official medium for West Malaysia, with exonormative acrolects retaining professional prestige. However, legal practitioners also need Malay as it is a requirement for admission to the bar and used extensively in government dealings, as well as in the lower courts of West Malaysia. Courtroom discourse is under the control of judges empowered to interpret language policy in the interests of justice. While there have been a few studies exploring how Malaysian advocates orientate themselves toward bilingualism, this is believed to be the first to address the perspective of judges

Economic Justice · Linguistics · Malay · Political science · Prestige · Public relations · Sociology · Asian Studies and History · Law · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy

Tools

Open DOI