Structural concepts of anastylosis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20499581 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ute Starosta (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 83-90 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-5033 • E-ISSN: 1753-5522 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1179/135050399793138707 |
| OpenAlex | W2029153650 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 2 |
Ancient buildings have been re-erected for more than one hundred years, during which time various concepts concerning the preservation of monuments have been developed. Classical buildings in particular – considered to represent the European cultural heritage – became the focus of fundamental discussions. In order to understand and compare approaches to historic monuments, this paper contrasts ancient and modern building structures. New supporting systems – using modern substitute materials and connecting elements – nevertheless remain weaker than the original structures. From the beginning of the twentieth century until recent years, the concepts of anastylosis have in many cases been determined by what was technologically feasible at the time
Archaeology · Architectural engineering · Cultural heritage · Building materials and conservation · Engineering · History
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2002 - 2024 (23) |
| Highly cited | No |