Purification as a tactic of marginalisation in business-community relations
Epistemic dimensions in the exclusion of Indigeneity in Arctic development strategy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20501147 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tiina Jääskeläinen (0000-0002-1202-0936, Hanken School of Economics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1169-1192 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-5084 • E-ISSN: 1461-7323 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/13505084231180478 |
| OpenAlex | W4383554208 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 59 |
This study reveals the tactic of purification as a form of neo-colonial marginalisation present in contemporary development strategies on Indigenous lands. The research is based on my fieldwork study of exclusive tactics in a contemporary development conflict on Indigenous lands: the Arctic Railway project in Sápmi, in Northern Europe. The tactic of purification works through the selective use of opposites in excluding Indigeneity. On the one hand, ‘pure’ Indigeneity is an excuse for proponents of extractive development projects to exclude Indigenous knowledge and identities as ‘too Indigenous’ according to modern standards, denouncing them as ‘backward’, ‘only culture’, ‘not profitable’, or ‘without knowledge’. Yet, simultaneously, a resemblance to profitable livelihood practices, beyond culture, the use of several knowledge systems, and multi-ethnicity in communities, is deemed ‘too modern’, therefore ‘not pure enough’, thus invalidating Indigeneity. Building on classification systems introduced during colonialism, settler societies employ purification as a tactic to deny Indigenous peoples their right to decolonisation projects, and strengthen their control of Indigenous lands. The purification tactic thereby enables the expansion of the modern-colonial capitalist world order
Agriculture · Archaeology · Colonialism · Decolonization · Environmental ethics · Indigenous · Livelihood · Political science · Sociology · Traditional knowledge · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · History · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Law · Mining and Resource Management · Ecology
Doing Critical Management Research
Storytelling Globalization from the Chaco and Beyond
Scientists’ warning on affluence
Conflict and Astroturfing in Niyamgiri
Who Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature
Title unavailable
Contested ecologies
Actor network theory and after
Epistemologies of the South
Extracting Legitimacy
Organizing rocks
Commentary
Populism/people/popular
Organising in defence of life
Natural Resource Extraction, Armed Violence, and Environmental Degradation
Whose Land Is It Anyway? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial Discourses
The Return of the Native
The Gaze of the Other
A World of Many Worlds
Posthumanist Performativity
Reassembling the Social
Local Histories/Global Designs
Earth Beings
Weight, Density and Space in the Norwegian Reindeer Crisis–Notes Towards a Critique
Gendering Environmental Assessment
Resistance to Mining. A Review
At the intersection of Arctic indigenous governance and extractive industries
Introduction
The Sámi reindeer herders’ conceptualizations of sustainability in the permitting of mineral extraction – contradictions related to sustainability criteria
Who is indigenous? ‘Peoplehood’ and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating indigenous identity
What is Hospitality in the Academy? Epistemic Ignorance and the (Im)Possible Gift
Institutionalization, neo-politicization and the politics of defining Sámi research
At the Critical Moment
Masking Subversion
Mapping mineral resources in a living land
We Have Never Been Modern
Actor-Network Theory, organizations and critique
From Binarism Back to Hybridity
The politics of planning
Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native
Confronting extractivism - the role of local struggles in the (un)making of place
Who Pays? Can We Pay Them Back
Decolonizing Methodologies
Sami Histories, Colonialism, and Finland
Corporate Social Responsibility
Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |