Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Giving the outrage a name – how researchers are challenging employment conditions under the hashtags #IchBinHanna and #IchBinReyhan

Bibliographic Data

ID20508307
AuthorsAhmadou Wagne (0009-0009-9314-206X, TU Wien), Elen Le Foll (0000-0002-5839-8010, University of Cologne), Florentine Frantz (0000-0003-1695-6798, University of Vienna), Jon Lasser (0000-0002-4274-4580, University of Graz, corresponding author), Jana Lasser (University of Graz)
Year2025
Volume28
Issue9
Pages1647-1673
Publication date2025-07-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInformation Communication & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-118X • E-ISSN: 1468-4462
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1369118x.2025.2452273
OpenAlexW4406607046
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited45

Outraged by the release of a ministerial video in which short-term employment contracts in German academia were lauded through the embodiment of fictitious doctoral researcher Hanna, thousands of researchers rallied behind the hashtags #IchBinHanna & #IchBinReyhan to vent their frustrations about precarious academic employment in Germany. The emerging connective action attracted a comparatively large number of researchers in a short period of time, stayed active for over two years, elicited reactions from policymakers and the media, and influenced current legislative developments in Germany. We analyse the discourse of over 45,000 tweets related to the movement from its onset in June 2021 to March 2023. Using a mixed-methods approach that combines machine-learning, corpus-linguistic, and qualitative analysis methods, we aim to distil the factors that led to the movement’s considerable success. The fast growth of the movement was likely driven by the use of an easy-to-personalise action frame and the large variety of discussion topics, facilitating the involvement of different groups of academics across career levels and employment conditions. Our analysis of the linguistic characteristics of the discourse reveals largely positive, constructive, and active exchanges, in which many of the most salient keywords are lexical verbs. Our analyses offer an explanation for the continued involvement of many activists and the successful translation of solutions developed by the movement to news reports and proposed law amendments, despite an absence of coordination by any formal organisation

Epistemology · Internet privacy · Media studies · Outrage · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Philosophy · Social Media and Politics

  • Deconstructing the ivory tower

    Open Access•Camille Belmin, Charlotte Bez et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Good Science from Below

    Open Access•Florentine Frantz•Minerva•2025

  • Bedingungen der Wissensproduktion

    Stefanie Leinfellner, Friederike Thole et al.•Bedingungen der Wissensproduktion•2023

  • Affective Publics

    Zizi Papacharissi•Affective publics•2014

  • HashtagActivism

    Sarah J Jackson, Moya Bailey et al.•#HashtagActivism•2020

  • Occupy Wall Street on the Public Screens of Social Media: The Many Framings of the Birth of a Protest Movement

    Open Access•Kevin Michael Deluca, Sean Lawson et al.•Communication Culture and Critique•2012

  • Quanteda

    Open Access•Kenneth Benoit, Kohei Watanabe et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2018

  • Hdbscan

    Open Access•Leland McInnes, John Healy et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2017

  • Keyness analysis

    Costas Gabrielatos•Corpus Approaches to Discourse•2018

  • Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information

    Open Access•Jonah Berger•Psychological Science•2011

  • Using Twitter to mobilize protest action

    Yannis Theocharis, Wendell Lowe et al.•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Affective publics and structures of storytelling

    Zizi Papacharissi•Information Communication & Society•2016

  • Hijacking #myNypd

    Open Access•Sarah J Jackson, B Foucault Welles•Journal of Communication•2015

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • Subjectivity, governance, and changing conditions of knowledge production in the life sciences

    Open Access•Lisa Sigl•Subjectivity•2019

  • An integrative framework on the impact of allies

    Open Access•Hema Preya Selvanathan, Brian Lickel et al.•European Journal of Social…•2020

  • Verbs as linguistic markers of agency

    Open Access•Magdalena Formanowicz, Janin Roessel et al.•European Journal of Social…•2017

  • Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research

    Open Access•Maximilian Fochler, U Felt et al.•Minerva•2016

  • Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy

    Open Access•Roger Burrows•The Sociological Review•2012

  • Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism

    Open Access•G Yang•Media and Communication•2016

  • The Logic of Connective Action

    W L Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg•Information Communication & Society•2012

  • On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty

    Open Access•Lisa Sigl•Science Technology & Human Values•2016

  • With #IchBinHanna, German academia protests against a law that forces researchers out

    Open Access•Andreas Bähr, Christine Blume et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

  • A Topology of Twitter Tactics

    Open Access•Paige Alfonzo•Social Media + Society•2021

  • The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation

    Open Access•Yannis Theocharis•Social Media + Society•2015

  • The Making of the Academic Precariat

    Open Access•Aslı Vatansever•Work Employment and Society•2023

  • Workers' Power in Resisting Precarity

    Open Access•Matteo Rizzo, Maurizio Atzeni•Work Employment and Society•2020

  • Solidarity at Work

    Open Access•Glenn Morgan, Valeria Pulignano•Work Employment and Society•2020

  • Computational Grounded Theory

    Open Access•Livingston Krumah Nelson•Sociological Methods & Research•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae