Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Online censorship and digital surveillance

The relationship between suppression technologies and democratization across countries

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20508656
AutoresElizabeth Stoycheff (0000-0003-4907-170X, Wayne State University, autor de correspondencia), Greg Burgess (0000-0001-5472-5128, Wayne State University), G Scott Burgess (Wayne State University), Maria Clara Martucci (0000-0003-4180-303X, Wayne State University)
Año2020
Volumen23
Número4
Páginas474-490
Fecha de publicación2020-03-20
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInformation Communication & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-118X • E-ISSN: 1468-4462
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1369118x.2018.1518472
OpenAlexW2890845033
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas26
Referencias citadas60

Using country- and multi-level analyses, we dissect how internet censorship and surveillance obstruct democratization, providing the first cross-national tests of online surveillance effects. Across 63 countries, online government monitoring is negatively associated with democratization, while internet censorship exhibits no additional effect. We theorize that suppression technologies erode democratic progress by thwarting collective action and examine how they affect individual-level disruptive political participation in a sub-sample of 21 countries. Together, these results suggest the need for greater scrutiny of countries that use suppression technologies. Political implications are discussed

Censorship · Democracy · Democratization · Internet privacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Scrutiny · Sociology · The Internet · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Social Media and Politics

  • Democratization in the Digital Era

    Open Access•Athiqah Nur Alami, Dien Nguyen An Luong et al.•JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies)•2023

  • Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda

    Open Access•Bei Qin, David Stromberg et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2017

  • Die Idee der Freiheit und ihre Semantiken

    Open Access•Nicole J Saam, Heiner Bielefeldt•Die Idee der Freiheit und Ihre…•2023

  • The Ethics of Surveillance in Times of Emergency

    Open Access•Kevin Macnish, Adam Henschke•Ethics of Surveillance in Times…•2023

  • Digital Pitfalls

    Open Access•A Aziz•Communication Culture and Critique•2021

  • Freedom and Constraint in Digital Environments

    Open Access•Sanaz Talaifar, Brian S Lowery•Perspectives on Psychological…•2022

  • Social Media's kangaroo court and censorship

    Open Access•Jonathan W Caudill•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2024

  • Blocking the information war? Testing the effectiveness of the EU’s censorship of Russian state propaganda among the fringe communities of Western Europe

    Open Access•Christiern Santos Okholm, Amir Ebrahimi Fard et al.•Internet Policy Review•2024

  • Watering down the wine

    Open Access•Daniëlle Flonk, Richard Mcneil-Willson•Policy & Internet•2023

  • Internet Freedom and Social Media’s Political Consequences

    Open Access•Biying Wu-Ouyang, Yang Hu•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2025

  • Factors that influence a country to exercise its capacity for digital repression

    Open Access•Georgiana Clarke, Donavon Johnson•Journal of Information Technology…•2026

  • The power of a promise

    Open Access•Lukas Antoine•Political Research Exchange•2022

  • Utility and the Attention Commodity

    Jessica Kim, Aarushi Bhandari•Sociology of Development•2026

  • The politics of internet shutdowns in Jammu and Kashmir

    Open Access•Raouf Ahmad Peerzada, Anil Prakash Sharma et al.•Human Geography•2025

  • Government Digital Repression and Political Engagement

    Open Access•Michael Chan, Jingjing Yi et al.•The International Journal of…•2022

  • Relatively Democratic

    Open Access•Elizabeth Stoycheff•The International Journal of…•2020

  • Knowing Is Disturbing

    Open Access•Danqi Guo, Genia Kostka•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Public Opinions Regarding Government Surveillance Rights in the United States

    Open Access•Nevbahar Ertas•Journal of Public Affairs•2025

  • The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance

    Open Access•Stephen Mccarthy, Wendy Rowan et al.•Internet Research•2023

  • How African countries respond to fake news and hate speech

    Open Access•Lisa Garbe, Lisa-Marie Selvik et al.•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Ethical ambiguity and complexity

    Di Di•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Contingent symbiosis

    Vincent G Huang, Hongyu Wu•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Cookies and content moderation

    Elizabeth Stoycheff•Journal of Information Technology…•2022

  • Strategic disruptions

    Open Access•Maureen Miner•Journal of Peace Research•2025

  • Designing and validating the Social Media Political Participation Scale

    Open Access•Cato Waeterloos, Michel Walrave et al.•Technology in Society•2021

  • Mitigating Information Insecurity

    Open Access•Jimmy Ochieng, Maria Elizabeth Grabe et al.•The International Journal of…•2026

  • Digital Citizenship

    Karen Mossberger, Caroline J Tolbert et al.•Digital Citizenship•2007

  • Reverse-engineering censorship in China

    Open Access•Gary King, Jennifer Pan et al.•Science•2014

  • An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling

    Open Access•Heather Woltman, Andrea Feldstain et al.•Tutorials in Quantitative Methods…•2012

  • When Do States Disconnect Their Digital Networks? Regime Responses to the Political Uses of Social Media

    Philip N Howard, Sheetal D Agarwal et al.•The Communication Review•2011

  • Under Surveillance

    Open Access•Elizabeth Stoycheff•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2016

  • The Logic of Connective Action

    W L Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg•Civic Media•2016

  • Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models

    Craig K Enders, Davood Tofighi•Psychological Methods•2007

  • Net Gains in Political Participation

    Andrea Kavanaugh, B Joon Kim et al.•Information Communication & Society•2008

  • Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires

    Jeroen Van Laer, Peter Van Aelst•Information Communication & Society•2010

  • Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China

    Ronggui Huang, Xiaoyi Sun•Information Communication & Society•2014

  • From connective to collective action

    Florian Toepfl•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • The Internet and Democracy

    Open Access•Michael L Best, Keegan W Wade•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2009

  • Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest

    Open Access•Zeynep Tufekci, Christopher P Wilson et al.•Journal of Communication•2012

  • Internet Use and Democratic Demands

    Open Access•Erik C Nisbet, Elizabeth Stoycheff et al.•Journal of Communication•2012

  • Driving Democracy

    Open Access•P Norris•Driving Democracy•2008

  • Who Owns the Media

    Simeon Djankov, Caralee McLiesh et al.•The Journal of Law and Economics•2003

  • Democratic Deficit

    Open Access•P Norris•Democratic Deficit•2011

  • Online Media and Offline Empowerment in Post-Rebellion Tunisia

    Anita Breuer, Jacob Groshek•Journal of Information Technology…•2013

  • Testing the Internet's Effect on Democratic Satisfaction

    Catie Snow Bailard•Journal of Information Technology…•2012

  • The Democratic Effects of the Internet, 1994—2003

    Open Access•Jacob Groshek•International Communication Gazette•2009

  • Online Surveillance’s Effect on Support for Other Extraordinary Measures to Prevent Terrorism

    Elizabeth Stoycheff, Kunto Adi Wibowo et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2017

  • The Value of Transparency

    Open Access•Scott Robbins, Adam Henschke•Surveillance & Society•2017

  • The virtual sphere

    Open Access•Zizi Papacharissi•New Media & Society•2002

  • Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation

    Open Access•Homero Gil De Zúñiga, Eulàlia Puig-i-Abril et al.•New Media & Society•2009

  • Privacy and the Panopticon

    Open Access•Elizabeth Stoycheff, Juan Liu et al.•New Media & Society•2018

  • Dual effects of the internet on political activism

    Open Access•Taehyun Nam•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation

    Open Access•Whasun Jho, Kyong Jae Song•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government

    Open Access•Teresa M Harrison, Djoko Sigit Sayogo•Government Information Quarterly•2014

  • Geographies of global Internet censorship

    Open Access•Barney Warf•GeoJournal•2010

  • A Psychological Firewall? Risk Perceptions and Public Support for Online Censorship in Russia

    Open Access•Erik C Nisbet, Olga Kamenchuk et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • Big Data and the Illusion of Choice

    Open Access•Saif Shahin, Pei Zheng•Social Science Computer Review•2018

  • Democracy online

    Open Access•Zizi Papacharissi•New Media & Society•2004

  • Predicting Political Discussion in a Censored Virtual Environment

    Yi Mou, David Atkin et al.•Political Communication•2011

  • Google Politics

    Open Access•Stephen A Meserve, Daniel Pemstein•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation

    Caroline J Tolbert, Caroline Tolbert et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • What’s the Bandwidth for Democracy? Deconstructing Internet Penetration and Citizen Attitudes About Governance

    Elizabeth Stoycheff, Erik C Nisbet•Political Communication•2014

  • Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research

    Shelley Boulianne•Political Communication•2009

  • Online Mobilization in Comparative Perspective

    C Vaccari•Political Communication•2017

  • Three Prompts for Collective Action in the Context of Digital Media

    Bruce Bimber•Political Communication•2017

  • Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest

    Shelley Boulianne•Political Communication•2011

  • Liberation Technology

    Open Access•L Diamond•Journal of democracy•2010

  • Liberation Technology

    Open Access•Rebecca Mackinnon•Journal of democracy•2011

  • Authoritarian persistence, democratization theory and the Middle East

    Open Access•Raymond Hinnebusch•Democratization•2006

  • Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies

    Open Access•Joachim Åström, Martin Karlsson et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • The Logic of Connective Action

    W L Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg•Information Communication & Society•2012

  • Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda

    Open Access•Bei Qin, David Stromberg et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2017

  • The Impact of Economic Development on Democracy

    Open Access•E Huber, Dietrich Rueschemeyer et al.•The Journal of Economic…•1993

  • Empowering activists or autocrats? The Internet in authoritarian regimes

    Open Access•Espen Geelmuyden Rød, Nils B Weidmann•Journal of Peace Research•2015

  • Comparative Democracy

    Open Access•Ross E Burkhart, Michael S Lewis-Beck•American Political Science Review•1994

  • How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression

    Open Access•Gary King, Jennifer Pan et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

Obras citantes distintas26
Citas por año2,89
Intervalo de citas2017 - 2026 (10)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 24
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae