Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Understanding adolescent engagement in media web surveys

How question design shapes nonresponse

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20509459
AutoresRicardo Gonzalez (0000-0002-0476-2331, Adolfo Ibáñez University, autor de correspondencia), Dörte Naber (0000-0001-8298-790X, Universidad de Granada), Adolfo Fuentes (0000-0001-7915-4616, Adolfo Ibáñez University)
Año2025
Páginas1-22
Fecha de publicación2025-10-23
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInformation Communication & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-118X • E-ISSN: 1468-4462
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1369118x.2025.2576798
OpenAlexW4415494270
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas44

Adolescent research in the field of communication has grown in prominence, yet methodologies tailored to this population remain underdeveloped. This study examines how adolescents engage with a self-administered web survey focused on media trust, news consumption, digital literacy, and political attitudes. We analyze patterns of non-substantive responding – such as selecting ‘don't know’ (DK) or providing no answer (NA) – as indicators of how young respondents interact with digital measurement interfaces in the context of communication research. Drawing on theoretical frameworks from survey methodology, we study how interface design features – such as question wording, response format, and sensitivity – shape adolescents’ engagement with media-related questions. Using data from 2,684 Chilean high school students (473,652 question-respondent observations), we estimate multilevel and multinomial logistic models that account for both the likelihood of providing a substantive response and, conditional on non-substantive responding, the choice between DK and NA. Results suggest a two-stage response process: question characteristics are more strongly associated with substantive responding, while the DK/NA distinction is primarily related to socioeconomic status, with question features playing a minor role. Although many findings are consistent with adult survey research, two important differences emerge: age is a more consistent predictor of non-substantive responding among adolescents, and question position is associated with declining non-substantive responses, suggesting a potential learning process across the survey. These findings offer new insights into adolescent interaction with digital surveys and demonstrate how adapting tools from survey methodology can improve communication research on youth media attitudes and behaviors

Digital media · Social media · The Internet · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Social Media and Politics · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Improving the Measurement of Household Composition in Cross-National Self-Administered Surveys

    Open Access•Dörte Naber, Ricardo Gonzalez et al.•Social Indicators Research•2026

  • Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students

    Open Access•C Chen, Shin-Ying Lee et al.•Psychological Science•1995

  • Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education?

    Open Access•Gerhard Meisenberg, Amandy Williams•Personality and Individual…•2008

  • Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents

    Open Access•Natacha Borgers, Dirk Sikkel et al.•Quality & Quantity•2004

  • The stability of individual response styles.

    Bert Weijters, Maggie Geuens et al.•Psychological Methods•2010

  • Family socioeconomic status and parental expectations affect mathematics achievement in a national sample of Chilean students

    Open Access•Marine Hascoët, Valentina Giaconi et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Open Access•Roger Tourangeau, Lance J Rips et al.•Psychology of Survey Response•2000

  • Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Applied Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys

    Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth et al.•Internet, Phone, Mail, and…•2014

  • Response Styles in Survey Research

    Yves Van Vaerenbergh, Troy Thomas et al.•International Journal of Public…•2013

  • Who Knows? Question Format and Political Knowledge

    J Robison•International Journal of Public…•2014

  • Variations in Response Style Behavior by Response Scale Format in Attitude Research

    N D Kieruj, Guy Moors•International Journal of Public…•2010

  • Explaining Interview Duration in Web Surveys

    Open Access•Tobias Gummer, Joss Roßmann•Social Science Computer Review•2014

  • The Willingness to State an Opinion

    Open Access•D Laurison•Sociological Forum•2015

  • Children as Respondents in Survey Research

    Open Access•Natacha Borgers, Edith De Leeuw et al.•Bulletin of Sociological…•2000

  • Nonresponse in name generators across countries and survey modes

    Open Access•Ricardo Gonzalez, Esteban Aedo–Muñoz et al.•Social Networks•2024

  • The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys

    Open Access•JAN PICKERY, Geert Loosveldt et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2001

  • Cross-National Adolescent Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Reports

    Open Access•Rich Gilman, E Scott Huebner et al.•Journal of Youth and Adolescence•2008

  • The 2019–2020 Chilean protests

    Ricardo Gonzalez, Carmen Le Foulon et al.•International Journal of Sociology•2020

  • Instructional manipulation checks

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer, Tom Meyvis et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009

  • Effects of Survey Question Comprehensibility on Response Quality

    Open Access•Timo Lenzner•CAM•2012

  • Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes

    Jerald G Bachman, Patrick M O’malley•Public Opinion Quarterly•1984

  • Cognitive Style and the Survey Response

    Thomas J Leeper•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • The Impact of “No Opinion” Response Options on Data Quality

    Jon A Krosnick, Allyson L Holbrook et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2001

  • Response Order Effects in Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally

    Allyson L Holbrook, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • Research Synthesis

    Open Access•Caroline Roberts, Emily Gilbert et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • The Impact of Question and Respondent Characteristics on Comprehension and Mapping Difficulties

    Allyson Holbrook, Y I Cho et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  • "Why people say "yes

    Eric S Knowles, Christopher A Condon et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • The Kiss Principle in Survey Design

    Open Access•Duane F Alwin, Brett Beattie et al.•Sociological Methodology•2016

  • The 2019 Chilean Social Upheaval

    Open Access•Loreto Cox, Ricardo Gonzalez et al.•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2023

  • Sensitive questions in surveys

    Roger Tourangeau, Ting Yan•Psychological Bulletin•2007

  • Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement

    Roger Tourangeau, Kenneth A Rasinski•Psychological Bulletin•1988

  • What sense do people make of a theory of planned behaviour questionnaire

    Open Access•Catherine D Darker, David P French•Journal of Health Psychology•2009

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae